Principal and Agent of Vicarious Liability for CLAT - Practice Questions & MCQ

Read the following passage and answer the question. 

This legal principle denotes that an individual or entity can be held accountable for the actions of another person, typically within the scope of a relationship where one party has the right, ability or duty to control the activities of the other.A common instance of vicarious liability is in an employer-employee relationship. If an employee causes harm to another while carrying out their duties, the employer could potentially be held liable. This is because the employer has control over the employee's activities during work and thus, indirectly, the consequences of those activities. For example, if a delivery driver negligently crashes into another car while on a delivery, the company could be held vicariously liable for the damage.The rationale behind vicarious liability lies in balancing the scales of justice and promoting safety. By holding employers accountable for their employees' actions, vicarious liability encourages them to enforce stricter safety measures and supervise their employees' conduct more effectively.However, it's worth noting that not all actions of an employee give rise to vicarious liability. 
The misconduct must occur within the 'course and scope' of employment. If the employee's actions were personal or outside the range of their duties, the employer may not be held responsible. Vicarious liability is not limited to employer-employee relationships; it can also arise in other contexts where one party has the right to control the conduct of another. These can include relationships between principals and agents, partners in a partnership, and even parents and their minor children in some jurisdictions. Vicarious liability, therefore, serves as a reminder that the ability to control another's conduct comes with a potential legal responsibility for their actions, encouraging all to exercise this power with care and diligence.

Question : At a school picnic, a teacher negligently leaves a gate open, and a child wanders off and gets injured. In this case

Read the given passage and answer the following question.

This legal principle denotes that an individual or entity can be held accountable for the actions of another person, typically within the scope of a relationship where one party has the right, ability and duty to control the activities of other.
A common instance of vicarious liability is in an employer-employee relationship. If an employee causes harm to another while carrying out their duties, the employer could potentially be held liable. This is because the employer has control over the employee's activities during work and thus, indirectly, the consequences of those activities. For example, if a delivery driver negligently crashes into another car while on a delivery, the company could be held by vicarious to liable for the damage.
The rationale behind vicarious liability lies in balancing the scales of justice and promoting safety. By holding employers accountable for their employees' actions, vicarious liability encourages them to enforce stricter safety measures and supervise Their employee's conduct more effectively.
However, it's worth noting that not all actions of an employee give rise to vicarious liability. The misconduct must occur within the 'course and scope' of employment. If the employee's actions were personal or outside the range of their duties, the employer may not be held responsible.
Vicarious liability is not limited to employer-employee relationships; it can also arise in other contexts where one party has the right to control the conduct of another. These can include relationships between principals and agents, partners in a partnership, and even parents and their minor children in some jurisdictions.
Vicarious liability, therefore, serves as a reminder that the ability to control another's conduct comes with a potential legal responsibility for their actions, encouraging all to exercise this power with care and diligence.

Question : During working hours, Mr. Smith, a pizza delivery driver for Pizzalicious, accidentally hits a pedestrian while he is resting to deliver a pizza. In this case

Read the following passage and answer the questions. 

This legal principle denotes that an individual or entity can be held accountable for the actions of another person, typically within the scope of a relationship where one party has the right, ability or duty to control the activities of the other. A common instance of vicarious liability is in an employer-employee relationship. If an employee causes harm to another while carrying out their duties, the employer could potentially be held liable. This is because the employer has control over the employee's activities during work and thus, indirectly, the consequences of those activities. For example, if a delivery driver negligently crashes into another car while on a delivery, the company could be held vicariously liable for the damage.The rationale behind vicarious liability lies in balancing the scales of justice and promoting safety. By holding employers accountable for their employees' actions, vicarious liability encourages them to enforce stricter safety measures and supervise their employees' conduct more effectively.However, it's worth noting that not all actions of an employee give rise to vicarious liability. 

The misconduct must occur within the 'course and scope' of employment. If the employee's actions were personal or outside the range of their duties, the employer may not be held responsible. Vicarious liability is not limited to employer-employee relationships; it can also arise in other contexts where one party has the right to control the conduct of another. These can include relationships between principals and agents, partners in a partnership, and even parents and their minor children in some jurisdictions. Vicarious liability, therefore, serves as a reminder that the ability to control another's conduct comes with a potential legal responsibility for their actions, encouraging all to exercise this power with care and diligence.

Question: During working hours, Mr. Smith, a pizza delivery driver for Pizzalicious, accidentally hits a pedestrian while he is rushing to deliver a pizza. In this case:

Which of the following case is related to Vicarious liablity of Principle & Agent ?