Profit and Loss Questions for CLAT 2026

Undue Influence for CLAT - Practice Questions & MCQ

Edited By admin | Updated on Sep 25, 2023 25:26 PM | #CLAT

Quick Facts

  • 7 Questions around this concept.

Solve by difficulty

Read the following passage and answer the question.
The term ‘Undue Influence’ has been defined under Section 16 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. According to Section 16 of the Indian Contract Act, A contract is said to be induced by ‘undue influence’ where the relations subsisting between the parties are such that one of the parties is in a position to dominate the will of the other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage over the other. In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing principle, a person is deemed to be in a position to dominate the will of another— Where he holds a real or apparent authority over the other, or where he stands in a fiduciary relation to the other; or Where he makes a contract with a person whose mental capacity is temporarily or permanently affected because of age, illness, or mental or bodily distress. Where a person who is in a position to dominate the will of another, enters into a contract with him, and the transaction appears, on the face of it or the evidence adduced, to be unconscionable, the burden of proving that such contract was not induced by undue influence shall be upon the person in a position to dominate the will of the other. Nothing in the subsection shall affect the provisions of section 111 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 
Essentials of Undue Influence are:
a) The person in the dominant position:
A person who is in a dominant position in relation to the other party can hold authority over the other and make the other party agree. Such consent is said to be obtained from Undue influence.

b) Real or Apparent Authority:
For example, an employer or manager may have any authority over his employees or subordinates. In such a situation, undue advantage can be taken by the person holding authority.
c) Fiduciary Relationship:
A relationship based on trust is known as a fiduciary relationship. The principle of undue influence applies when confidence is reposed or betrayed. Some of examples of fiduciary relationships are parent and child, husband and wife, master and servant, etc.
d) The person in mental or bodily distress
The law has protected those persons who are in mental and physical distress due to illness, age, etc. Illustration (b) of Section 16 states that if a man who is sick is induced by a medical attendant to pay an unreasonable amount for his services, then the medical attendant has exercised undue influence. An agreement is voidable at the option of the party whose consent has been obtained from undue influence under Section 19 A of the Indian Contract Act, of 1872.
Question :
A doctor convinces a mentally ill patient to sign a contract that greatly benefits the doctor. Which principle of 'undue influence' is demonstrated in this scenario?

 

Read the following passage and answer the question.
The term ‘Undue Influence’ has been defined under Section 16 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. According to Section 16 of the Indian Contract Act, A contract is said to be induced by ‘undue influence’ where the relations subsisting between the parties are such that one of the parties is in a position to dominate the will of the other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage over the other. In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing principle, a person is deemed to be in a position to dominate the will of another— Where he holds a real or apparent authority over the other, or where he stands in a fiduciary relation to the other; or Where he makes a contract with a person whose mental capacity is temporarily or permanently affected because of age, illness, or mental or bodily distress. Where a person who is in a position to dominate the will of another, enters into a contract with him, and the transaction appears, on the face of it or the evidence adduced, to be unconscionable, the burden of proving that such contract was not induced by undue influence shall be upon the person in a position to dominate the will of the other. Nothing in the subsection shall affect the provisions of section 111 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 
Essentials of Undue Influence are:
a) The person in the dominant position:
A person who is in a dominant position in relation to the other party can hold authority over the other and make the other party agree. Such consent is said to be obtained from Undue influence.

b) Real or Apparent Authority:
For example, an employer or manager may have any authority over his employees or subordinates. In such a situation, undue advantage can be taken by the person holding authority.
c) Fiduciary Relationship:
A relationship based on trust is known as a fiduciary relationship. The principle of undue influence applies when confidence is reposed or betrayed. Some of examples of fiduciary relationships are parent and child, husband and wife, master and servant, etc.
d) The person in mental or bodily distress
The law has protected those persons who are in mental and physical distress due to illness, age, etc. Illustration (b) of Section 16 states that if a man who is sick is induced by a medical attendant to pay an unreasonable amount for his services, then the medical attendant has exercised undue influence. An agreement is voidable at the option of the party whose consent has been obtained from undue influence under Section 19 A of the Indian Contract Act, of 1872.
Question :
Which of the following relationships is NOT an example of a fiduciary relationship?

 

 

 

Concepts Covered - 1

Undue Influence

Introduction Undue Influence:

  • Undue influence refers to a situation where one party in a contractual relationship takes unfair advantage of their position of power, trust, or authority to manipulate the other party into making a contract against their free will. 

Key Elements of Undue Influence:

  • Dominant Position or Special Relationship: Undue influence often occurs when one party occupies a position of dominance, trust, or authority over the other. This dominance can arise due to familial ties, financial dependency, professional relationships, or any other circumstance that grants one party significant influence over the other.
  • Unfair Persuasion: The dominant party uses their position to persuade, manipulate, or coerce the vulnerable party into entering the contract. This persuasion is typically unfair, unethical, and aims to deprive the vulnerable party of their free choice.
  • Victim's Vulnerability: The party subjected to undue influence is usually in a vulnerable state, making them unable to resist or fully comprehend the implications of the contract. Vulnerability can result from factors such as age, mental incapacity, illness, ignorance, or economic dependency.

Types of Undue Influence:

  • Actual Undue Influence: This occurs when there is clear evidence of one party using their dominant position to manipulate the other into the contract. It involves direct coercion, pressure, or threats.
  • Presumed Undue Influence: In certain relationships, the law presumes that undue influence exists due to the inherent inequality in the parties' positions. Such relationships include those between parents and children, doctors and patients, or lawyers and clients. In presumed undue influence cases, the burden of proof may shift to the dominant party to demonstrate that the contract was entered into freely.

Examples of Undue Influence:

  • Elderly Parent and Adult Child: An elderly parent, dependent on their adult child for care and support, is persuaded to sign over their valuable property to the child. The child exploits their parent's vulnerability and trust for personal gain.
  • Employer and Employee: An employer, aware of an employee's financial difficulties, coerces the employee into signing a contract that unfairly favors the employer, threatening job loss if the employee refuses.

Legal Remedies for Undue Influence:

  • Voidable Contract: Contracts formed under undue influence are voidable at the option of the party subjected to influence. The victim can choose to affirm the contract or void it upon discovering the undue influence.
  • Rescission: Rescission is the legal process of canceling or undoing a contract. The victim can seek a court order to rescind the contract, returning both parties to their original positions before the contract was formed.
  • Damages: If the victim has suffered financial or other losses due to the undue influence, they may also seek compensation through a damages claim.

Indian Case Law - Mahadeolal Kanodia v. Administrator-General of West Bengal (1960):

  • Background
    • In the case of Mahadeolal Kanodia v. Administrator-General of West Bengal (1960), the Supreme Court of India dealt with a situation where undue influence was alleged in a contractual agreement.
  • Facts of the Case
    • Mahadeolal Kanodia was a wealthy businessman who had executed a will in favor of his two brothers and the Administrator-General of West Bengal.
    • The will included a clause through which the assets would go to the Administrator-General if the brothers predeceased Mahadeolal Kanodia.
    • After the death of the brothers, Mahadeolal Kanodia expressed a desire to revoke the will and execute a new one in favor of his wife.
    • He claimed that the will had been executed under undue influence exerted by his brothers.
  • Key Legal Issue
    • The primary issue before the Supreme Court was whether the will in favor of the Administrator-General should be set aside due to the alleged undue influence by Mahadeolal Kanodia's brothers.
  • Judgment and Significance

The Supreme Court, in its judgment, emphasized the importance of proving undue influence in cases where it is alleged. The key points from this case are as follows:

  • Burden of Proof: The court ruled that the burden of proving undue influence lies with the party alleging it. In this case, it was Mahadeolal Kanodia who claimed that his brothers had unduly influenced him to execute the will in favor of the Administrator-General.
  • Standard of Proof: To establish undue influence, the standard of proof is that it must be established to the satisfaction of the court. In other words, it is not enough to merely allege undue influence; one must provide sufficient evidence to convince the court that it indeed occurred.
  • Shift of Burden of Proof: Once the party alleging undue influence has provided enough evidence to raise a presumption of undue influence, the burden of proof shifts to the party accused of exerting undue influence. In this case, it would be Mahadeolal Kanodia's brothers who would need to demonstrate that the will was not the result of coercion or manipulation.
  • Protection of Vulnerable Parties: The judgment underscored the court's commitment to protecting vulnerable parties, such as those subjected to undue influence, and ensuring that contracts or legal instruments are not formed under duress or coercion.

"Stay in the loop. Receive exam news, study resources, and expert advice!"

Get Answer to all your questions