CLAT Mock Test 2025 PDF: Online Free Mock Test by Careers360

HMA 1955, HAS 1956, HAMA 1956, HMGA for CLAT - Practice Questions & MCQ

Edited By admin | Updated on Sep 25, 2023 25:47 PM | #CLAT

Quick Facts

  • 6 Questions around this concept.

Solve by difficulty

According to the Hindu Marriage Act of 1955, which of the following is NOT a reason for divorce?

Who among the following is eligible to adopt a kid legally under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956?

Who is deemed the natural guardian of a Hindu minor boy under the age of five in situations where both parents are still living, per the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act of 1956?

 

What key interpretation of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act was made in the Gita Hariharan v. Reserve Bank of India (1999) case?

Concepts Covered - 1

HMA 1955, HAS 1956, HAMA 1956, HMGA

1. Hindu Marriage Act (HMA) 1955:

  • Purpose and Scope:
    • The HMA 1955 is a comprehensive law that governs Hindu marriages in India. It aims to regulate and provide legal sanctity to Hindu marriages, ensuring the rights and responsibilities of spouses.
  • Key Provisions:
    • Conditions for a Valid Marriage: The HMA lays down conditions for a valid Hindu marriage, including age, mental capacity, and prohibited degrees of relationship.
    • Registration: Hindu marriages must be registered to be legally recognized.
    • Grounds for Divorce: The Act provides grounds for divorce, including cruelty, adultery, desertion, and more.

2. Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act (HAMA) 1956:

  • Purpose and Scope:
    • HAMA 1956 regulates adoption and maintenance among Hindus, providing legal provisions for adopting children and ensuring the maintenance of dependents.
  • Key Provisions:
    • Adoption: The Act outlines the procedures for adoption, eligibility criteria for adoptive parents, and the rights and obligations of adopted children and adoptive parents.
    • Maintenance: HAMA mandates that Hindu husbands must provide maintenance to their wives, children, and aged parents who are unable to support themselves.

3. Hindu Succession Act (HAS) 1956:

  • Purpose and Scope:
    • HAS 1956 governs the inheritance and succession of property among Hindus. It aims to ensure equitable distribution of property among family members.
  • Key Provisions:
    • Daughters' Rights: The Act significantly amended Hindu law by granting daughters equal rights to ancestral property. Earlier, daughters were excluded from inheriting ancestral property.
    • Rules of Succession: HAS provides rules for intestate succession, i.e., when a Hindu dies without a will. It specifies who inherits the deceased's property.

4. Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act (HMGA):

  • Purpose and Scope:
    • HMGA regulates matters concerning the guardianship of minors among Hindus, ensuring the welfare of minor children and their property.
  • Key Provisions:
    • Appointment of Guardians: The Act outlines the appointment and powers of guardians for minors and their property. Guardians may be appointed by the court or by a will.
    • Welfare of the Child: HMGA emphasizes that the welfare of the child is of paramount consideration in matters of guardianship and custody.

Indian Constitution and Family Laws:

  • The Indian Constitution, under Articles 14, 15, and 25, ensures that these family laws apply without discrimination and protect the rights of all individuals, regardless of gender, caste, or creed.

Case Law: Gita Hariharan v. Reserve Bank of India (1999)

  • Background
    • The case involved a custody dispute between divorced parents, Gita Hariharan and her ex-husband, regarding their two children, a daughter, and a son.
  • Key Issues
    • Determination of child custody during and after divorce proceedings.
    • The paramount consideration in matters of guardianship and custody, especially concerning the welfare of the child.
  • Key Findings and Rulings
    • The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Gita Hariharan and held that the welfare of the child is of paramount consideration in matters of guardianship and custody during and after divorce.
    • The court emphasized that gender-based distinctions in laws related to guardianship are unconstitutional and violate the fundamental rights of both parents and the welfare of the child.
    • The judgment established the principle that the welfare of the child should be the primary concern when determining guardianship and custody matters, regardless of the gender of the parents.
  • Impact
    • The case emphasized the importance of considering the child's welfare as the primary factor in guardianship and custody matters during and after divorce.
    • It promoted gender-neutral laws concerning guardianship, ensuring that both fathers and mothers have equal rights and responsibilities regarding their children's welfare.
    • The judgment underscored the significance of upholding constitutional principles of equality and non-discrimination in family law matters in India.


 

"Stay in the loop. Receive exam news, study resources, and expert advice!"

Get Answer to all your questions

Back to top