Meaning of Public Authority for CLAT - Practice Questions & MCQ

Understanding the concept of "Public Authority" is fundamental within the framework of the Right to Information Act (RTI). A "Public Authority" denotes any entity, institution, or organization that operates under the umbrella of the government's control, funding, or management. This concept holds immense significance as it delineates the entities that are bound by the obligations of sharing information as per the RTI Act.

Key Points:

• Defining Public Authority: A comprehensive definition of a public authority under the RTI Act encompasses bodies that are either owned, substantially funded, or significantly controlled by the government. This includes government departments, ministries, local governing bodies, public sector undertakings, statutory authorities, and more.
• Government's Regulatory Influence: Entities that are substantially influenced or controlled by the government are brought under the purview of public authorities. This control could manifest in appointments, decision-making authority, or substantial financial dependence.
• Financial Criterion: The RTI Act extends its scope to private organizations that receive substantial financial aid from the government. While there isn't a fixed benchmark for the amount, the financial assistance should be significant and indicative of governmental influence.
• Degree of Autonomy: Even entities with a certain level of functional autonomy can be classified as public authorities if they remain significantly influenced by the government's control or funding.

Consumer

    |

    |---(File complaint)---> District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (DDRC)

    |    |

    |    |---(Appeal)---> State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (SCDRC)

    |    |

    |    |---(Appeal)---> National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC)

    |

    |---(File complaint directly)---> NCDRC

• A consumer can file a complaint with any of these authorities. The complaint can be filed in writing or electronically. The complaint must be accompanied by a fee of Rs. 100 for the DDRC, Rs. 500 for the SCDRC, and Rs. 1000 for the NCDRC.
• The authority will then issue a notice to the opposite party and conduct a hearing. The authority may pass an order directing the opposite party to pay compensation to the consumer, refund the amount paid by the consumer, or take other corrective measures.
• The consumer can appeal against the order of the DDRC to the SCDRC and the order of the SCDRC to the NCDRC. The appeal must be filed within 30 days of the date of the order.

Examples 

• Example - Government Departments: Ministries like the Ministry of Education or the Ministry of Environment are quintessential examples of public authorities as they are directly governed by the government and are accountable for policy formulation and implementation.
• Example - Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs): Public sector undertakings like Indian Oil Corporation or Steel Authority of India are categorized as public authorities due to their government ownership and substantial reliance on government funds.
• Example - Local Government Bodies: Municipal corporations and village panchayats also fall under the umbrella of public authorities since they receive financial backing from the government and execute administrative functions at the grassroots level.
• Example - NGOs with Government Funding: Non-governmental organizations that obtain substantial financial support from the government for executing public welfare projects can also be designated as public authorities within the RTI framework.

Case Law: Central Board of Secondary Education vs. Aditya Bandopadhyay (2011)

• In this notable case, the Supreme Court provided crucial insights into the interpretation of the term "Public Authority" within the framework of the RTI Act. The Court's ruling emphasized a broad interpretation of the term, extending its scope to encompass entities significantly funded by the government, regardless of their legal status.

Key Points:

• Expansive Interpretation: The Supreme Court advocated for an expansive understanding of the term "Public Authority" under the RTI Act.
• Inclusion of Funded Entities: The Court asserted that entities substantially funded by the government should be considered within the ambit of "Public Authority."
• Irrespective of Legal Status: The Court's interpretation disregards the legal status of the entity and focuses on the extent of government funding as a determining factor.
• Emphasis on Government Influence: The ruling underscores the importance of government influence, control, and financial support in categorizing an entity as a public authority.
• Guidance for Application: The verdict provides guidance for practical application, directing that entities meeting the funding threshold should be responsive to RTI requests.
• Significance of Ruling: The ruling broadened the scope of entities covered by the RTI Act, ensuring transparency even in cases where entities may not be traditionally classified as public bodies.