The Indian Judicial system follows both merit-based and collegium-based appointment processes. Unlike the federal structure where the executive and legislature are separate at the union and state levels, the judiciary has a single uniform structure in India with the Supreme Court of India at the top. At the lower level of judicial architecture, recruitments are merit-based with typical judiciary examinations conducted by the state public service commissions. However, the collegium-based appointment system comes at the top of the judicial hierarchy, the judge's appointments at the High Court and Supreme Court. The collegium system of appointment of judges at the Supreme Court and High Courts has not been bereft of criticism for the ambiguity and arbitrariness it brings into the system. However, keeping the criticism of the collegium system aside, this article looks into the appointment process of judges in the Supreme Court of India. Read the complete article below.
Article 124 of the Indian Constitution deals with the appointment of Supreme Court Judges. The provision talks about the composition of the Supreme Court of India, appointment, tenure of Judges, age limit, conditions of disqualification, oath and affirmations among others. The simplified version of the relevant article and its clauses are given below.
The first clause of Article 124 provides for the establishment of a Supreme Court of India consisting of a Chief Justice of India and up to seven other judges.
The Parliament of India can increase the number of Supreme Court judges by passing a law. Consequently, the parliament passed the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Act, 1956 to increase the number of judges in the Supreme Court of India. The Act has been amended from time to time to keep up with the increasing work pressure of the judiciary. The most recent amendment was made in August 2019 when the total number of Supreme Court judges was increased from 30 to 33.
Article 124 (2) deals with the appointment of judges in the Supreme Court. The provisions say that all the judges in the Supreme Court of India will be appointed by the President of India in consultation with the judges of the Supreme Court and High Court as the President may deem necessary.
The word “Consultation” raised the question of whether the President has to abide by the consultation or not. The second question was about the composition of such a committee (collegium). The four judges' cases have tried to address these questions.
The collegium system for judges' appointments has evolved from these cases over a period of time. Here is the summary of the collegium system for Supreme Court Judges' appointment.
Case | Conclusion |
---|---|
First judge case (1981) (S P Gupta Vs Union of India) | The word “Consultation” in Article 124 (2) does not mean concurrence. The president remains the final authority in the matters of the appointment of judges. |
Second Judge case (1993) (Advocates-on-Record Association Vs Union of India) | SP Gupta judgment is overruled. The collegium system for appointments and judicial transfers begins while giving primacy to the Chief Justice of India. Collegium means two senior-most judges and CJI. |
Third judge case (1998) | Collegium broadened. Now CJI and four senior-most judges comprise the collegium. The senior-most judge in the SC to be made CJI |
Fourth judge case (2015) | The National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) was declared null and void. |
The above four cases have shaped the current collegium system for the appointment of judges. It must be noted that no article of the Indian Constitution mentions the word “Collegium” for judicial appointments.
The Supreme Court Collegium is headed by the Chief Justice of India and four other senior-most judges are part of it. In the case of High Courts, the Collegium comprises of Chief Justice of the concerned High Court along with four senior-most judges from that Court.
Appointment of Supreme Court Judges: The Procedure
The appointment process can be divided into two parts for a better understanding of the process in the context of the Constitution, current traditions and the four judges’ cases.
The senior-most judge of the Supreme Court is appointed as the Chief Justice of India.
The outgoing Chief Justice of India, at an appropriate time, gives the recommendation to the Law ministry regarding the appointment of the next Chief Justice of India.
In case of any doubt regarding the seniority or fitness of the judge for the office of CJI, consultation with other judges will be made.
Once the Union Law Ministry receives the recommendations, the Minister will forward the recommendation to the Prime Minister who in turn will advise the President of India regarding the appointment of CJI.
Whenever there is a vacancy in the Supreme Court, the Chief Justice of India sends a proposal and recommendations to the Ministry of Law to fill up the vacancy.
The recommendation of CJI is nothing but the Collegium recommendations consisting of CJI and four senior-most judges which also includes the successor CJI.
Additionally, the views of the senior-most judge who hails from the High Court where the recommended person comes will be taken into consideration. Views of other Supreme Court judges will also be taken if they have occupied the office of judge or Chief Justice in that High Court.
The recommendation of the collegium and the senior-most judge of that High Court will be made in writing to the Ministry of Law.
The ministry will put the recommendations to the Prime Minister who will advise the President in the matter of appointment.
Further, the person recommended for the office of the Supreme Court must be medically fit. The person has to submit a medical certificate signed by the civil surgeon or medical officer.
Once the President signs the warrant of appointment, the Department of Justice and Ministry of Law will issue the appointment in the Gazette of India.
The Article 124 (2) also provides that the Supreme Court Judge shall meet the following conditions:
The person must be a citizen of India
The person must have been a Judge of a High Court or two or more Courts in succession for at least five years
Or, has been an advocate of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession for at least 10 years
Or is a distinguished jurist in the opinion of the President
The Indian Constitution leaves the matter of age limit to the parliament. There is no age limit for the appointment of the Supreme Court Judge. However, the retiring age of the SC judge is 65 years as per the Constitutional provision.
There is no age limit for the appointment of the Supreme Court judge. However, the retirement age of a judge of the Supreme Court is 65.
The current strength of the Supreme Court judges is 33.
Article 124 of the Indian Constitution deals with the establishment of the Supreme Court of India, the appointment of judges, and age among other things.
Yes, an advocate who has practised in a High Court or two or more High Courts for 10 years in succession is eligible to become a Judge of the Supreme Court of India provided he/she meets all other conditions laid down in the Constitution of India.
A lawyer is a professional who practises law. An Individual in the lawyer career path defends his or her client's cases and makes arguments on his or her behalf in both criminal and civil proceedings. A lawyer may advise and assist clients on how they should handle their legal issues. An individual as a career in law in India is considered one of the most sought-after careers.
A lawyer's job requires inhibiting skills. It involves practical applications of abstract legal theories and knowledge to solve specialised individual problems or to facilitate the interests of those who hire a lawyer to perform legal services. Here, in this article, we will discuss how to become a lawyer after 10th, is lawyer a good career in India, and how to become a lawyer in India.
Are you searching for a civil lawyer job description? A civil lawyer is a law professional who deals with disputes that come under civil law. Civil law is applicable to issues related t property and business disputes, family disputes, and torts. A tort can be defined as a civil wrong that causes the other person harm or injury. A Civil lawyer handles disputes regarding personal injury, family relationships, real estate, and employment. A career as a civil lawyer requires working with government entities and business institutions.
Individuals in the human rights lawyer career path are legal professionals responsible for advocating for people whose inherent dignity has been violated and who have suffered a lot of injustice. They take cases to defend the human rights of minorities, vulnerable populations, the LGBTQI community, indigenous people and others.
A criminal lawyer is a lawyer who specialises in the field of crimes and punishments. Individuals who have been accused of committing a crime are guided by a criminal lawyer. Bail bond hearings, plea bargains, trials, dismissal hearings, appeals, and post-conviction procedures are all part of his or her work. Criminal law is the body of law that describes criminal acts, governs the arrest, prosecution, and trial of offenders, and defines the sentences and correctional options that are available to criminals.
Family lawyers are required to assist a client in resolving any family-related problem. In general, family lawyers operate as mediators between family members when conflicts arise. Individuals who opt for a career as Family Lawyer is charged with drafting prenuptial agreements to protect someone's financial interests prior to marriage, consulting on grounds for impeachment or civil union separation, and drafting separation agreements.
Cyber law careers deal with cyber law job opportunities concerning cybercrimes of all aspects such as cyberbullying, cyber frauds, cyber stalking, sharing personal information without consent, intellectual property and intellectual property, transactions, and freedom of speech.
An immigration lawyer is responsible for representing the individuals (clients) involved in the immigration process that includes legal, and illegal citizens and refugees who want to reside in the country, start a business or get employment.
A career as Government Lawyer is a professional who deals with law and requires to work for the government. He or she is required to work for either the state government or central government and is also known as Advocate General of the state and attorney general. A career as Government Lawyer requires one to work on behalf of government ministers and administrative staff. He or she gives legal advice and provides legal services in the public interest.