ICFAI-LAW School BA-LLB / BBA-LLB Admissions 2025
Ranked 1 st among Top Law Schools of super Excellence in India - GHRDC | NAAC A+ Accredited | #36 by NIRF
AIBE Application Date:29 Sep' 25 - 28 Oct' 25
The Bar Council of India will release the detailed AIBE 20 syllabus through its official website. The AIBE 20 (XX) syllabus will be similar to the previous year's syllabus. However, if BCI introduces any updates in the AIBE 20 syllabus, the same will be changed here. The syllabus of AIBE 20 is comprehensive, and there are a total of 19 subjects in the All India Bar Examination. One of the very important subjects in the AIBE syllabus is the law of tort. The Law of Tort subject also comprises the Motor Vehicle Act and Consumer Protection Law. The AIBE 20 Law of Tort will consist of 5 questions out of the total 100 questions. Law of Tort holds 5% weightage in the AIBE 20 exam. Read the complete article to get detailed information about AIBE 2025 Law of Tort syllabus, topics, sub-topics, notes, preparation tips, important governing bodies and more.
This Story also Contains
(a) Origin and Development of Law of Torts in England – Forms of action; specific remedies from case to case.
(b) Evolution of Law of Torts in India- uncodified and judge-made; advantages and disadvantages.
(c) Meaning and function of Law of Torts- Prescribing standards of human conduct, redressal of wrongs by payment of compensation, injunction.
(d) Definition of tort
(e) Constituents of tort – wrongful act, legal damage and remedy – injuria sine damno
and damnum sine injuria ;ubi jus ibi remedium
(f) Tort vis-a-vis other wrongs e.g. crime, breach of contract, etc.
(g) Relevance of intention, motive and malice in Law of Torts
Important Cases
1. White v. John Warrick & Co., Ltd., (1953) 2 All ER 1021
2. Town Area Committee v. Prabhu Dayal, AIR 1975 All. 132
3. P. Seetharamayya v. G. Mahalakshmamma, AIR 1958 AP 103
4. Rajkot Municipal Corporation v. Manjulben Jayantilal Nakum & ors.
1997 (9) SCC 552
5. Ashby v. White (1703) 2 Lord Raym 938
6. Municipal Corpn. of Agra v. Asharfi Lal, AIR 1921 All. 202
7. Mayor of Bradford Corpn. v. Pickles (1895) AC 587
8. Gloucester Grammar School case (1410) Y.B. 11 hen. IV of 47
(a) Consent as defence – volenti non fit injuria – Essentials for the application of the defence;
Exceptions to the defence – Rescue cases and Unfair Contract Terms Act, 1977 (U K)
(b) Statutory authority
(c) Act of God/vis major
Important Cases
Smith v. Charles Baker and Sons (1891) AC 325 (HL)
South Indian Industrial Ltd., Madras v. Alamelu Ammal, AIR 1923 Mad. 565
Haynes v. Harwood (1935) 1 K B 146
Ramchandraram Nagaram Rice & Oil Mills Ltd. v. Municipal Commissioners of Purulia Municipality, AIR 1943 Pat. 408
Manindra Nath Mukherjee v. Mathuradas Chatturbhuj,
AIR 1946 Cal. 175
Hall v. Brooklands Auto Racing Club (1932) 1 KB 205
T.C. Balakrishnan v. T.R. Subramanian, AIR 1968 Ker. 151
(a) Theories of Negligence
(b) Meaning and Definition
(c) Essential Ingredients – duty to take care, breach of duty, consequent damage
(d) Proof of Negligence- Res ipsa loquitor
(e) Manufacturer’s Negligence
(f) Medical Negligence
Important Cases
Donoghue v. Stevenson (1932) All ER Rep. 1
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Subhagwanti, AIR 1966 SC 1750
Pinnamaneni Narasimha Rao v. Gundavarapu Jayaprakash, AIR 1990 AP 207
Jacob Mathew v. State of Punjab (2005) 6 SCC 1
Malay Kumar Ganguly v. Sukumar Mukherjee AIR 2010 SC 1162
Khenyei v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. – (2005) 9 SCC 273
(a) Meaning
(b) Impact theory- From personal injury, from property damage
(c) Foreseeability of psychiatric illness
(d) Immediate aftermath test
(e) Primary victims, secondary victims
Important Cases
Hambrook v. Stokes Bros. (1924) All ER Rep. 110
(Hay or) Bourhill v. Young (1942) 2 All ER 396 (HL)
McLoughlin v. O’Brian (1982) 2 All ER 907 (HL)
Alcock v. Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police(1991) 4 All ER 907 (HL)
Page v. Smith (1995) 2 All ER 736
Dulieu v. White (1901) 2 KB 669
King v. Phillips (1953) 1 QB 429
(a) Causation- But for test, concurrent causes, consecutive causes, proof of causation
(b) Novus actus interveniens
(c) Tests of Remoteness of Damage- Natural and proximate consequence, directness and foreseeability
(d) Eggshell Skull Rule
Important Cases
In Re An Arbitration between Polemis and Furness, Withy & Co. (1921) All ER Rep. 40
Overseas Tankship [UK] Ltd. v. Morts Dock & Engineering Co. [The Wagon Mound] (1961) 1 All ER 404
Hughes v. Lord Advocate (1963) AC 837
Smith v. Leech Brain & Co. (1961) 3 All ER 1159
(a) Meaning and rationale of no fault liability
(b) Rule of Strict Liability- Rule in Rylands v. Fletcher- origin, scope and exceptions, application of the Rule in India
(c) Rule of Absolute Liability in M.C. Mehta v. Union of India
(d) Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster case
(e) No fault liability under the Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991
(f) No fault liability in hit and run cases under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
Important Cases
Rylands v. Fletcher (1868) LR 3 HL 330.
M. C. Mehta v. Union of India, AIR 1987 SC 1086.
M. P. Electricity Board v. Shail Kumar, AIR 2002 SC 551.
The Madras Railway Co. v. The Zemindar of Carvatenagarum, LR (1874) 1 IA 364
(a) Meaning and basis of vicarious liability- Position in England and India
(b) Government Liability in Torts – (1) Constitutional Provisions; (2) Sovereign and non- sovereign functions
(c) Law Commission of India, “First Report on the Liability of the State in Tort” (May, 1956)
(d) Violation of Fundamental Rights and sovereign immunity, Concept of Constitutional torts
Important Cases
State of Rajasthan v. Vidhyawati (1962) Supp. 2 SCR 989
Kasturilal Ralia Ram Jain v. State of U. P. (1965) 1 SCR 375
N. Nagendra Rao & Co. v. State of A. P., AIR 1994 SC 2663
Chairman, Railway Board v. Chandrima Das (2002) 2 SCC 465
(a) Meaning- Libel and slander
(b) Essential Conditions
(c) Defences- Justification by truth, fair and bonafide comments, privilege (absolute and qualified), consent and apology
Important Cases
Prof. Imtiaz Ahmad v. Durdana Zamir (2009) 109 DRJ 357
Tushar Kanti Ghosh v. Bina Bhowmick (1953) 57 CWN 378
Rustom K. Karanjia v. K. M. D. Thackersey, AIR 1970 Bom. 424
Melepurath Sankunni Ezhuthassan v. Thekittil Geopalankutty Nair (1986) 1 SCC 118
Part B: Consumer Protection Laws
(b) The objectives and reasons for enactment of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019
1. Definitions of consumer, service, defect, deficiency, complaint, complainant, goods, manufacturer, misleading advertisement, restrictive trade practice, unfair contract, unfair trade practice
2. Three-tier Consumer Dispute Redressal Mechanism and enhancement of pecuniary jurisdiction. Provisions in the CPA, 2019
3. Establishment of Consumer Protection Councils
4. Establishment of Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA)
5. The inclusion of e-commerce transactions
6. Specific recognition of six rights of consumers
7. Introduction of the concept of product liability
8. Stringent penalties for misleading advertisements
9. Introduction of mediation as an Alternate Dispute Resolution mechanism
10. Remedies for unfair contracts
11. Expansion of the definition of Unfair Trade Practices
Important cases
Faqir Chand Gulati v. Uppal Agencies Private Ltd. (2008) 10 SCC 345
Indian Medical Association v. V. P. Shantha, AIR 1996 SC 550
Medicos Legal Action Group v. Union of India, 2021 SCC Online Bom 3696
Laxmi Engineering Works v. P.S.G. Industrial Institute, 1995 SCC (3) 583.
Lucknow Development Authority v. M.K. Gupta, 1994 SCC (1) 243
J.J. Merchant v. Srinath Chaturvedi, AIR 2002 SC 2931
Neena Aneja v. Jai Prakash Associates Ltd., (2022) 2 SCC 161
Here are some preparation tips to ace the AIBE 20 (XX) Law of Tort:
Thoroughly understand the syllabus: The first and foremost thing candidates must do before starting their preparations is understand what topics and sub-topics will be covered in the entrance exam.
Practice Previous Year AIBE Question Papers: Attempting the AIBE previous year question papers is a really good way to understand the exam pattern. Apart from knowing the paper pattern, candidates will be able to test their preparations for the AIBE exam.
Make short notes during preparation: Making short notes of important topics and concepts is a really helpful way of memorizing what you have studied. These short notes will also help students in revision later.
Leave ample time for revision - Candidates must plan their preparations in such a manner they have enough time for revision once they have completed the entire syllabus. Revision is very crucial in preparation.
Preparing for the AIBE exam requires revision for each topic included in the syllabus of AIBE. Candidates can refer to the AIBE preparation books online/offline to ensure they cover the entire AIBE syllabus topic-wise:
Name of the Book | Author/Publisher |
Tort Law | P.S. Atchuthan |
Motor Vehicles Act: A Commentary | A. S. Bansal |
Consumer Protection Law in India | R. S. Sharma |
Law of Torts and Consumer Protection | G. R. Dhananjay |
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
The AIBE 2025 syllabus has a total of 19 different subjects including three new topics.
General category candidates need to score minimum 45% marks while reserved category candidates must score minimum 40% marks to pass the exam.
No, the AIBE is not an open book exam. However, candidates can carry bare acts in the exam.
On Question asked by student community
Hello, Here is a clear and simple breakdown of who is eligible for the AIBE 20 (All India Bar Examination).
To be eligible for AIBE 20, you essentially need to have completed two main steps after your schooling:
In short, the only people who can apply for AIBE 20 are those who have already graduated with a law degree and have also officially registered themselves as advocates with a State Bar Council.
Hello dear candidate,
the previous year question papers and last ten years question paper for AIBE exam is given in the link given below:-
https://law.careers360.com/articles/aibe-19-exam-2024-download-past-10-years-question-papers-pdf
I hope you find this helpful.
Thank you.
Whether or not signing your full name instead of your signature on the AIBE 19 answer booklet's self-declaration form would result in disqualification is uncertain. It depends on the specific rules and regulations of the AIBE examination and how strictly they are enforced, you can also check the official website or contact the concerned authorities.
Hello,
If you forgot to mention the booklet code in your AIBE 2024 application, follow these steps:
Act promptly to avoid complications.
Hope it helps !
If you forgot to mention your booklet set code and other details on your AIBE 2024 exam OMR sheet while filling the rest of the information correctly, your exam may not be evaluated properly, and you could potentially face a delay in your results or even have your exam invalidated; however, there might still be a chance to rectify the situation.
Since AIBE exam is OMR based paper and is checked by using a specialized scanner called an "OMR scanner" which reads the darkened bubbles on the sheet, interpreting them as answers, and then comparing them to the answer key to generate a score - essentially, the machine "reads" the marks made on the paper to determine the correct answers, all through a process called Optical Mark Recognition (OMR). If it doesn't recognise your booklet code there are chances that it could not process your answer on code basis.
Reach out to the Bar Council of India (BCI) as soon as possible through their official website or helpline number. Explain the situation clearly, mentioning that you filled in all the details correctly except for the booklet set code and other missing information.
If possible, try to attach a scanned copy of your OMR sheet where you can highlight the correctly filled details and the missing booklet set code.
Hope it is helpful to you!!!
700+ Campus placements at top national and global law firms, corporates and judiciaries
Grade 'A+' accredited by NAAC | Ranked 33rd by NIRF 2025
18 years of shaping legal professionals | In-house judicial coaching | Proven success in National Moot Court Competitions
NAAC A+ Grade | Among top 100 universities of India (NIRF 2024) | 40 crore+ scholarships distributed
India's youngest NAAC A++ accredited University | NIRF rank band 151-200 | Approved by Bar Council of India
Ranked 1 st among Top Law Schools of super Excellence in India - GHRDC | NAAC A+ Accredited | #36 by NIRF