Careers360 Logo
ask-icon
share
    CLAT Fourth Merit List 2026 (Postponed) - Download PDF here

    Creation of Agency and Rights and duties of Agents for CLAT - Practice Questions & MCQ

    Edited By admin | Updated on Sep 25, 2023 25:47 PM | #CLAT

    Quick Facts

    • 8 Questions around this concept.

    Solve by difficulty

    Read the given passage very carefully and answer the question.

    An agency arrangement is a form of general contract. As such, except where the agency is irrevocable, an agency can terminate in the same way as a contract is discharged. Only the act or consent of the parties to the agency or the enforcement of the law may terminate the relationship between the principal and the agent. “In the absence of anything to prove its termination, an agency, when proven to have existed, will be presumed to have continued, unless such a length of time has elapsed as destroys the presumption.” When an entity is dissolved, the obligation of the agent to work on behalf of the principal comes to an end. A government law or instrument may stipulate the timeline for the termination of an entity.

    In such a case, if the instrument states in clear and unambiguous terms that after the expiry of the time stated in the instrument, an agency shall terminate without intervention on the part of the principal or administrator, the agency shall, in effect, terminate. If the parties maintain their partnership as principal and agent after the expiry of the duration given in the contract, a substantiated assumption is posed that their relationship is regulated by the original contract and that the contract is extended for a similar term. For example, where the parties entered into a contract for a year and proceeded to behave after one year under the contractual conditions, the court would conclude that the parties genuinely wanted to hold the contract alive for a period of time.

    On the other hand, if no reasonable deadline has been set by the parties for the expiration of the contract, the contract is assumed to have been terminated after a reasonable period of time. “The nature of the act specifically authorised, the formality of the authorisation, the likelihood of changes in the purposes of the principal, and other factors shall determine what constitutes a reasonable period of time during which the authority continues.” In comparison, the burden of proving an agency’s termination or revocation lies with the agency.

    Question

    Lalit enters into a contract whereby Shekhar has to provide Lalit for a given period of time with services, which both parties realize are for use in a particular enterprise owned by Lalit, Lalit sold his enterprise to Raj before the expiry of the contract within Shekhar and Lalit, without paying Shekhar for his services. Here-

     

    An agent has the right to:

    According to Section…..,  any person who has attained the age of majority and has a sound mind can appoint an agent. In other words, any person capable of contracting can legally appoint an agent. Minors and persons of unsound mind cannot appoint an agent. Identify the section.

    Concepts Covered - 1

    Creation of Agency and Rights and Duties of Agents

    Creation of Agency: 

    • The concept of "Creation of Agency and Rights and Duties of Agents" is pivotal in Indian Contract Law, as it governs the relationships between principals and agents. 
    • These relationships are common in various legal contexts, including business transactions, real estate deals, and more. 

    Principal-Agent Relationship:

    • A principal is an individual or entity that authorizes another party, known as the agent, to act on their behalf in legal matters or transactions.
    • This relationship is established through an agreement between the principal and the agent, where the agent consents to act on behalf of the principal while following their instructions and guidelines.

    Types of Agency:

    • Express Agency: Created when the principal and agent explicitly agree, either in writing or verbally, to establish an agency relationship with specific terms.
    • Implied Agency: Arises when the actions or conduct of the parties imply an agency relationship, even without a formal written agreement.
    • Apparent Agency: Occurs when the principal's actions or representations lead third parties to reasonably believe that an agency relationship exists, resulting in legal obligations for the principal.
    • Agency by Ratification: When a person without prior authorization acts on behalf of the principal, and the principal later accepts or ratifies those actions as if they were authorized.

    Rights and Duties of Agents:

    Rights of Agents:

    • Right to Compensation and Reimbursement:
      • Agents have the right to receive compensation or commissions as agreed upon with the principal.
      • They are entitled to reimbursement for reasonable expenses incurred while carrying out their agency duties, such as travel expenses.
    • Right to Indemnification:
      • Agents have the right to be indemnified by the principal for any losses or liabilities they may incur while acting within the scope of their authority.

    Duties of Agents:

    • Duty of Loyalty:
      • Agents owe the principal a duty of utmost loyalty and must act in the principal's best interests. They should avoid any conflicts of interest.
    • Duty of Diligence and Care:
      • Agents are obligated to exercise reasonable diligence, care, and skill when performing their agency tasks.
      • They should make informed decisions and act prudently to achieve the principal's objectives.
    • Duty to Follow Instructions:
      • Agents must follow the lawful instructions and directives given by the principal within the scope of their authority.
      • Deviating from these instructions without authorization may lead to legal consequences.
    • Duty of Disclosure:
      • Agents are required to provide full disclosure of all material facts and information to the principal. This includes any information that may influence the principal's decisions.
      • Transparency is essential to maintain trust in the agency relationship.

    Examples:

    • Real Estate Agent:
      • A real estate agent (the agent) is authorized by a property owner (the principal) to sell their house. The agent has the right to receive a commission upon the successful sale of the property and a duty to act in the seller's best interests.
    • Stockbroker:
      • A stockbroker (the agent) is given authority by an investor (the principal) to buy and sell stocks on their behalf. The agent has the right to receive commissions and must diligently execute trades in the investor's best interest.

    Case Law: Ma Chun Chew Anthony v. Ng Swee Koon Peter

    • Background:
      • In this case, Ma Chun Chew Anthony (the agent) was representing Ng Swee Koon Peter (the principal) in a real estate transaction.
      • The agent was responsible for facilitating the sale of a property on behalf of the principal.
      • During the course of the transaction, the agent became aware of certain material facts about the property that could potentially impact the principal's decision to proceed with the sale.
    • Agent's Duty of Disclosure:
      • The key issue in this case revolved around the agent's duty to disclose these material facts to the principal.
      • The court emphasized that agents owe a fundamental duty of full and honest disclosure to their principals. This duty requires agents to provide all relevant information that might influence the principal's decision-making process.
      • The agent's failure to disclose such material facts can compromise the transparency and fairness of the transaction.
    • Ruling and Implications:
      • In the case of Ma Chun Chew Anthony v. Ng Swee Koon Peter, the court ruled in favor of the principal.
      • The court found that the agent had not fully and honestly disclosed the material facts related to the property.
      • This failure to disclose crucial information was seen as a breach of the agent's duty to the principal.
      • As a result, the court held that the transaction was not conducted in a transparent and fair manner.
    • Importance and Implications:
      • This case serves as a reminder of the critical duty of disclosure that agents owe to their principals.
      • Agents must provide all relevant information to their principals, especially when it may impact the principal's decision.
      • Failing to disclose material facts can lead to legal consequences and damage the trust and integrity of the principal-agent relationship.
      • The case underscores the significance of transparency and honesty in maintaining the trust of principals in agency relationships.

     

    "Stay in the loop. Receive exam news, study resources, and expert advice!"

    Get Answer to all your questions