8 Questions around this concept.
Read the given passage very carefully and answer the question.
An agency arrangement is a form of general contract. As such, except where the agency is irrevocable, an agency can terminate in the same way as a contract is discharged. Only the act or consent of the parties to the agency or the enforcement of the law may terminate the relationship between the principal and the agent. “In the absence of anything to prove its termination, an agency, when proven to have existed, will be presumed to have continued, unless such a length of time has elapsed as destroys the presumption.” When an entity is dissolved, the obligation of the agent to work on behalf of the principal comes to an end. A government law or instrument may stipulate the timeline for the termination of an entity.
In such a case, if the instrument states in clear and unambiguous terms that after the expiry of the time stated in the instrument, an agency shall terminate without intervention on the part of the principal or administrator, the agency shall, in effect, terminate. If the parties maintain their partnership as principal and agent after the expiry of the duration given in the contract, a substantiated assumption is posed that their relationship is regulated by the original contract and that the contract is extended for a similar term. For example, where the parties entered into a contract for a year and proceeded to behave after one year under the contractual conditions, the court would conclude that the parties genuinely wanted to hold the contract alive for a period of time.
On the other hand, if no reasonable deadline has been set by the parties for the expiration of the contract, the contract is assumed to have been terminated after a reasonable period of time. “The nature of the act specifically authorised, the formality of the authorisation, the likelihood of changes in the purposes of the principal, and other factors shall determine what constitutes a reasonable period of time during which the authority continues.” In comparison, the burden of proving an agency’s termination or revocation lies with the agency.
Question
Lalit enters into a contract whereby Shekhar has to provide Lalit for a given period of time with services, which both parties realize are for use in a particular enterprise owned by Lalit, Lalit sold his enterprise to Raj before the expiry of the contract within Shekhar and Lalit, without paying Shekhar for his services. Here-
An agent has the right to:
According to Section….., any person who has attained the age of majority and has a sound mind can appoint an agent. In other words, any person capable of contracting can legally appoint an agent. Minors and persons of unsound mind cannot appoint an agent. Identify the section.
New: CLAT Previous Year Question Paper with Solutions
CLAT 2027: Mock Test | Sample Papers | Legal Current Affairs (March)
Admission Alert: Law Applications Open at Jindal Global Law School
Creation of Agency:
Principal-Agent Relationship:
Types of Agency:
Rights and Duties of Agents:
Rights of Agents:
Duties of Agents:
Examples:
Case Law: Ma Chun Chew Anthony v. Ng Swee Koon Peter
"Stay in the loop. Receive exam news, study resources, and expert advice!"