Free consent for CLAT - Practice Questions & MCQ

Definition of Coercion:

• Coercion, under Section 15 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, refers to a situation where one party compels another to enter into a contract by committing or threatening to commit any act forbidden by the Indian Penal Code (IPC) or an act that is considered unlawful. In simpler terms, it involves using force, threats, or intimidation to obtain the consent of the other party to enter into a contract.

Essential Elements of Coercion:

• To establish coercion in a contract, the following elements must be present:
• Committing or Threatening an Unlawful Act: The party exerting coercion must either commit an unlawful act or threaten to commit such an act. This act can be criminal or civil in nature.
• Inducing the Contract: The unlawful act or threat must be the reason the other party enters into the contract. In legal terms, it must be the "but for" cause of the contract. If the coerced party would not have entered into the contract but for the coercion, it is considered coercion.

Examples of Coercion:

• Physical Harm: A common example of coercion is when one party threatens physical harm to the other if they do not agree to a contract. For instance, if A threatens to assault B unless B signs a contract, this constitutes coercion.
• Economic Coercion: Coercion can also take an economic form. Suppose A threatens to destroy B's business reputation by spreading false information unless B enters into a contract. This economic threat can also be classified as coercion.
• Blackmail: A classic example of coercion is blackmail. If A threatens to reveal embarrassing or damaging information about B unless B signs a contract, it is a clear case of coercion.
• Threat to Sue: Sometimes, parties may threaten legal action (suing) to coerce the other party into a contract. However, if the threatened legal action lacks merit, it can be deemed coercion. For instance, if A threatens to file a baseless lawsuit against B unless B agrees to a contract, it amounts to coercion.

Consequences of Coercion:

• When a contract is entered into due to coercion, it is not void ab initio (from the beginning) but voidable at the option of the coerced party.
• This means that the party subjected to coercion has the choice to either affirm the contract (treat it as valid) or reject it (treat it as void).
• If they choose to reject it, they can seek its annulment in court.

Case Law: Ranganayakamma v. Alwar Setti (1948)

• In this case, the defendant threatened to commit suicide if the plaintiff did not transfer her property to him.
• The court held that such a threat constituted coercion, rendering the contract voidable.
• This case emphasizes that coercion can extend beyond physical harm and include emotional or psychological pressure.