Parul University Law Admissions 2025
Registrations Deadline- 12th June | India's youngest NAAC A++ accredited University | NIRF rank band 151-200 | Approved by Bar Council of India
The Delhi High Court has finished the CLAT UG 2025 hearing and reserved its judgment on a batch of petitions challenging the CLAT 2025 results. The Delhi HC will hear the pleas challenging the CLAT PG 2025 results on April 21, 2025. A division bench comprising Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela heard all the petitions concerning errors in CLAT UG questions and answers on April 9. The decision on the CLAT UG 2025 petitions will be delivered at a later date.
Like other High Courts, the Delhi High Court follows the general provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) regarding reserved judgments. The CPC said that reserved judgments are supposed to be delivered within 30 days from the date on which the hearing of the case was concluded. However, the Delhi High Court is expected to deliver the final judgment tentatively in the fourth week of April or the first week of May, 2025. The Consortium of National Law Universities will notify the CLAT 2025 counselling dates once the final judgment is out.
See Also:
The Delhi HC has deferred its verdict on multiple petitions challenging the results of CLAT UG 2025. This year, the CLAT 2025 exam faced a significant backlash, with numerous students across the country pointing out errors in the questions and answers. Despite the Consortium of NLUs standing firm and making minor concessions, dissatisfied students seek judicial intervention.
Registrations Deadline- 12th June | India's youngest NAAC A++ accredited University | NIRF rank band 151-200 | Approved by Bar Council of India
Ranked #28 amongst Institutions in India by NIRF | Ranked #1 in India for Academic Reputation by QS Rankings | 16.6 LPA Highest CTC
On December 20, 2024, Justice Jyoti Singh partially upheld a plea by a 17-year-old CLAT aspirant Aditya Singh, concerning alleged mistakes in the CLAT UG 2025 exam. This decision was appealed before a division bench of the High Court, with the Consortium of NLU arguing that the single judge had wrongly assumed the role of an expert. The candidate also appealed, requesting further revision of his CLAT 2025 results. Subsequently, the consortium of NLU approached the Supreme Court to transfer the case to the apex court. As petitions challenging CLAT 2025 results are pending in other courts, including the Madhya Pradesh and Bombay High Courts, the Supreme Court on February 6 directed that all cases related to CLAT be transferred to the Delhi High Court to avoid parallel proceedings.
The petitioners have highlighted at least 15 disputed questions and answers, though this list may not be comprehensive, as additional pleas were filed after the Consortium of NLU responded. The decision of the CLAT UG 2025 HC hearing is pending before a bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela.
The Consortium of NLUs allowed students to challenge the CLAT 2025 answer key by December 3, with objections reviewed by an Expert Committee and then an Oversight Committee. The Expert Committee, led by a former Vice-Chancellor, suggested changing two answers and dropping five questions. The Oversight Committee, chaired by a former High Court Chief Justice, recommended the withdrawal of 4 questions from the CLAT 2025 final answer key. In court, it was noted that the Expert Committee gave a split decision on 2 logical reasoning questions, and the Oversight Committee disagreed with the Expert Committee's opinion on 2 questions.
Petitioners claimed the Oversight Committee failed to evaluate several questions referred by the Expert Committee without any explanation.
One petitioner stated that “The Oversight Committee failed in performing it's duty as it applied it's mind only in respect of Eight (8) questions in total; and that comprised only four (4) out of the disputed fourteen (14) questions which were placed before it, whereas rest of the l0 disputed questions were never considered,”. Petitioner Aditya Singh states that no reasons were given by both the committees for the correct answers declared by them. Let’s look at the alleged errors by the candidates section-wise.
Numerous objections were raised in the Legal Reasoning section, but the Oversight Committee did not review these. Petitioners emphasised that the syllabus specifies that no prior legal knowledge is needed for these questions. This was something even the High Court pointed out in the last hearing. The Chief Justice remarked, "You are testing legal understanding of a Class 12th student. He would not know consideration. This is for the experts to decide, but I don't know. Will it be possible for a Class 12 student to know the meaning of consideration under Contract Law?"
Question 56. This passage question on Constitutional Law was met with 451 objections.
Questions 77-79: This section includes a passage about void and voidable contracts, based on which questions were asked. One question about the nature of a contract between an adult and a minor received 622 objections. However, 389 objections were filed in another question from the same passage asking candidates to pick which one of the given illustrations would be a void agreement.
Question 81: A Legal Reasoning passage question on the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act is also under challenge.
Question 11: A passage question in the English section faced 891 objections due to an apparent error. The Expert Committee and the Oversight Committee differed in opinion on this question. The single judge acknowledged the discrepancy and ordered the Consortium to revise it. The Consortium has appealed against this direction.
Question 37: One question of the Current Affairs section pertains to a passage on the 16th BRICS Summit. The Oversight Committee did not assess this question.
Question 49: Another Current Affairs question, based on a passage on the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam, was met with 148 objections.
Question 88: A seat arrangement question in this section was recommended for withdrawal by the Expert Committee. However, the Oversight Committee overruled this, deciding instead to change the answer to option D.
Question 97: A question based on a passage on the impact of COVID-19 and housing insecurity, the Expert Committee gave a split opinion, differing on option C and option D. The Oversight Committee sided with one expert option C as the correct answer.
Question 93: For another question of the same passage, the Expert Committee again gave a split opinion, and the Oversight Committee agreed with the answer chosen by one expert and changed the answer to option C.
Question 91: In the next question of the same passage, the Oversight Committee did not give its opinion.
Question 114: The Expert Committee declared that option D is the correct answer. Meanwhile, the Oversight Committee did not assess the question.
Question 115: The Expert Committee declared option A as the correct answer. The Oversight Committee did not assess the question.
Question 116: It was argued that a mistaken reference to question 115 appeared across all sets of the CLAT UG 2025 exam. However, the serial number of questions differed in each set of the paper. The Expert Committee determined option B as correct, but the Oversight Committee did not assess the question.
Petitioners and many candidates await the court’s decision on the CLAT UG 2025 results, and successful candidates who agree with the CLAT final answer key 2025 are preparing to intervene. One candidate told the court on April 9 that they are supporting the Consortium’s stand. During the CLAT 2025 Delhi HC hearings, the court questioned the paper-setters and the composition of committees reviewing objections in Logical and Legal Reasoning, stating, "You say questions are made by experts. For legal questions, GK, we understand. For logical and quantitative questions, they are part of maths, you do not teach maths. Then who sets these questions?". Regardless of the verdict, the Consortium must improve its objections process and ensure that qualified individuals set the paper and review the candidates' objections.
Hello Aspirant,
With an AIR of 11,588 in CLAT 2025 and the OBC (Women) category rank of 2,068, your prospects at the top NLUs are not too bright. However, referring to the previous years' trends, you may have some chances of getting into some of the new/low-ranked NLUs in OBC-Women category. You can consider:
Check this link: CLAT NLU Cut Off 2025
Hello Sushil,
You will be eligible to take the CLAT examination in December 2027.
Since you will be giving your Class 12 board exams in February 2027, you will not be eligible for the CLAT held in December 2026. CLAT requires candidates to either have passed or be appearing in the Class 12 examination in the same academic year of admission.
Important points:
CLAT is conducted in December for admission in the next academic year.
You must have completed or be appearing in Class 12 by the year of admission.
Since your Class 12 boards are in 2027, your valid CLAT attempt will be in December 2027.
You should prepare accordingly for the CLAT 2027 attempt.
I hope this answer helps you. If you have more queries, feel free to share your questions with us, and we will be happy to assist you.
Thank you, and I wish you all the best in your bright future.
Hii,
No, you cannot use CLAT to gain admission to Banaras Hindu University (BHU) for a B.A.LL.B. For admission to the B.A.LL.B program, BHU administers its own entrance exam, known as CUET UG (Common University Entrance Test-Undergraduate).
Therefore, you must take CUET UG rather than CLAT if you wish to enroll in BHU's B.A.LL.B program. National Law Universities (NLUs), not BHU, use CLAT for admission.
you have a good chance to get admission into some of the better Tier 3 NLUs. These offer academic programs and opportunities to explore various fields of law, including corporate law, constitutional law, and international law. Some of the Tier 3 NLUs have growing reputations and offer a balanced mix of academics and practical exposure, which can help you build a solid foundation for your legal career. Choosing the right college will also depend on your preferences for location, campus facilities, and specializations, so researching these factors alongside your rank will help you make a well-informed decision
Hello there,
With an All India Rank (AIR) of 3924 and EWS category rank 306 in CLAT, here’s what you can generally expect:
You have a
good chance of admission
in some of the
newer or less competitive NLUs
.
Admission in
top NLUs
like NLSIU Bangalore, NALSAR Hyderabad, NUJS Kolkata, WBNUJS Kolkata, or NLU Delhi may be difficult, as their closing ranks are usually within the top 1000 or so.
You can expect better chances at NLUs like:
NLIU Bhopal
NLU Jodhpur
HNLU Raipur
GNLU Gandhinagar
RMLNLU Lucknow
CNLU Patna
These NLUs often have closing ranks ranging from around 2000 to 5000 for EWS category, so your rank fits well within this range.
I hope this answer helps you. If you have more queries, feel free to share your questions with us, and we will be happy to assist you.
Thank you, and I wish you all the best in your bright future.
A lawyer advises clients on legal matters, represents them in court, and drafts legal documents. They work in various fields like criminal, corporate, or family law. Key skills include communication, research, and analytical thinking. To become a lawyer in India, one must complete a law degree, clear entrance exams, register with the Bar Council, and pass the All India Bar Examination.
Are you searching for a civil lawyer job description? A civil lawyer is a law professional who deals with disputes that come under civil law. Civil law is applicable to issues related t property and business disputes, family disputes, and torts. A tort can be defined as a civil wrong that causes the other person harm or injury. A Civil lawyer handles disputes regarding personal injury, family relationships, real estate, and employment. A career as a civil lawyer requires working with government entities and business institutions.
Individuals in the human rights lawyer career path are legal professionals responsible for advocating for people whose inherent dignity has been violated and who have suffered a lot of injustice. They take cases to defend the human rights of minorities, vulnerable populations, the LGBTQI community, indigenous people and others.
A criminal lawyer is a lawyer who specialises in the field of crimes and punishments. Individuals who have been accused of committing a crime are guided by a criminal lawyer. Bail bond hearings, plea bargains, trials, dismissal hearings, appeals, and post-conviction procedures are all part of his or her work. Criminal law is the body of law that describes criminal acts, governs the arrest, prosecution, and trial of offenders, and defines the sentences and correctional options that are available to criminals.
Family lawyers are required to assist a client in resolving any family-related problem. In general, family lawyers operate as mediators between family members when conflicts arise. Individuals who opt for a career as Family Lawyer is charged with drafting prenuptial agreements to protect someone's financial interests prior to marriage, consulting on grounds for impeachment or civil union separation, and drafting separation agreements.
A cyber lawyer handles legal issues related to the internet, such as cybercrimes, data breaches, and online privacy. They prepare legal documents, represent clients in court, and advise businesses on cybersecurity compliance. The career requires a law degree, specialisation in cyber law, and strong tech knowledge.
An immigration lawyer is responsible for representing the individuals (clients) involved in the immigration process that includes legal, and illegal citizens and refugees who want to reside in the country, start a business or get employment.
A Government Lawyer represents the government in legal matters, provides legal advice to officials, drafts legislation, and prosecutes or defends cases. The role requires strong research, communication, and analytical skills. To pursue this career, one must obtain an LLB, pass the Bar Exam, gain court experience, and apply for government positions. Career progression includes roles from junior to senior government lawyer.
700+ Campus placements at top national and global law firms, corporates, and judiciaries
NAAC A+ Grade | Among top 100 universities of India (NIRF 2024) | 40 crore+ scholarships distributed
Ranked #28 amongst Institutions in India by NIRF | Ranked #1 in India for Academic Reputation by QS Rankings | 16.6 LPA Highest CTC
NAAC A+ Grade | Ranked No.1 Private University in India (QS World University Rankings 2025)
Ranked #1 Among all Private Indian Universities in QS Asia Rankings 2025 | Scholarships worth 210 CR
Internship Opportunities in leading Law Firms, Industry, Governmental Departments and NGOs