UPES Integrated LLB Admissions 2025
Ranked #28 amongst Institutions in India by NIRF | Ranked #1 in India for Academic Reputation by QS Rankings | 16.6 LPA Highest CTC | Last Date to Apply: 15th May
The Delhi High Court has finished the CLAT UG 2025 hearing and reserved its judgment on a batch of petitions challenging the CLAT 2025 results. The Delhi HC will hear the pleas challenging the CLAT PG 2025 results on April 21, 2025. A division bench comprising Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela heard all the petitions concerning errors in CLAT UG questions and answers on April 9. The decision on the CLAT UG 2025 petitions will be delivered at a later date.
Latest: CLAT 2025 Delhi HC Judgement - Download Order PDF
CLAT 2026: Best Books for CLAT Preparation | 10 Free Mock Tests | Syllabus
Suggest: CLAT 2025 College Predictor
CLAT 2025: Expected Cut Off & Past Trends | Marks vs Rank
Like other High Courts, the Delhi High Court follows the general provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) regarding reserved judgments. The CPC said that reserved judgments are supposed to be delivered within 30 days from the date on which the hearing of the case was concluded. However, the Delhi High Court is expected to deliver the final judgment tentatively in the fourth week of April or the first week of May, 2025. The Consortium of National Law Universities will notify the CLAT 2025 counselling dates once the final judgment is out.
See Also:
The Delhi HC has deferred its verdict on multiple petitions challenging the results of CLAT UG 2025. This year, the CLAT 2025 exam faced a significant backlash, with numerous students across the country pointing out errors in the questions and answers. Despite the Consortium of NLUs standing firm and making minor concessions, dissatisfied students seek judicial intervention.
Ranked #28 amongst Institutions in India by NIRF | Ranked #1 in India for Academic Reputation by QS Rankings | 16.6 LPA Highest CTC | Last Date to Apply: 15th May
Ranked 1 st among Top Law Schools of super Excellence in India - GHRDC | NAAC A+ Accredited | #36 by NIRF
On December 20, 2024, Justice Jyoti Singh partially upheld a plea by a 17-year-old CLAT aspirant Aditya Singh, concerning alleged mistakes in the CLAT UG 2025 exam. This decision was appealed before a division bench of the High Court, with the Consortium of NLU arguing that the single judge had wrongly assumed the role of an expert. The candidate also appealed, requesting further revision of his CLAT 2025 results. Subsequently, the consortium of NLU approached the Supreme Court to transfer the case to the apex court. As petitions challenging CLAT 2025 results are pending in other courts, including the Madhya Pradesh and Bombay High Courts, the Supreme Court on February 6 directed that all cases related to CLAT be transferred to the Delhi High Court to avoid parallel proceedings.
The petitioners have highlighted at least 15 disputed questions and answers, though this list may not be comprehensive, as additional pleas were filed after the Consortium of NLU responded. The decision of the CLAT UG 2025 HC hearing is pending before a bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela.
The Consortium of NLUs allowed students to challenge the CLAT 2025 answer key by December 3, with objections reviewed by an Expert Committee and then an Oversight Committee. The Expert Committee, led by a former Vice-Chancellor, suggested changing two answers and dropping five questions. The Oversight Committee, chaired by a former High Court Chief Justice, recommended the withdrawal of 4 questions from the CLAT 2025 final answer key. In court, it was noted that the Expert Committee gave a split decision on 2 logical reasoning questions, and the Oversight Committee disagreed with the Expert Committee's opinion on 2 questions.
Petitioners claimed the Oversight Committee failed to evaluate several questions referred by the Expert Committee without any explanation.
One petitioner stated that “The Oversight Committee failed in performing it's duty as it applied it's mind only in respect of Eight (8) questions in total; and that comprised only four (4) out of the disputed fourteen (14) questions which were placed before it, whereas rest of the l0 disputed questions were never considered,”. Petitioner Aditya Singh states that no reasons were given by both the committees for the correct answers declared by them. Let’s look at the alleged errors by the candidates section-wise.
Numerous objections were raised in the Legal Reasoning section, but the Oversight Committee did not review these. Petitioners emphasised that the syllabus specifies that no prior legal knowledge is needed for these questions. This was something even the High Court pointed out in the last hearing. The Chief Justice remarked, "You are testing legal understanding of a Class 12th student. He would not know consideration. This is for the experts to decide, but I don't know. Will it be possible for a Class 12 student to know the meaning of consideration under Contract Law?"
Question 56. This passage question on Constitutional Law was met with 451 objections.
Questions 77-79: This section includes a passage about void and voidable contracts, based on which questions were asked. One question about the nature of a contract between an adult and a minor received 622 objections. However, 389 objections were filed in another question from the same passage asking candidates to pick which one of the given illustrations would be a void agreement.
Question 81: A Legal Reasoning passage question on the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act is also under challenge.
Question 11: A passage question in the English section faced 891 objections due to an apparent error. The Expert Committee and the Oversight Committee differed in opinion on this question. The single judge acknowledged the discrepancy and ordered the Consortium to revise it. The Consortium has appealed against this direction.
Question 37: One question of the Current Affairs section pertains to a passage on the 16th BRICS Summit. The Oversight Committee did not assess this question.
Question 49: Another Current Affairs question, based on a passage on the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam, was met with 148 objections.
Question 88: A seat arrangement question in this section was recommended for withdrawal by the Expert Committee. However, the Oversight Committee overruled this, deciding instead to change the answer to option D.
Question 97: A question based on a passage on the impact of COVID-19 and housing insecurity, the Expert Committee gave a split opinion, differing on option C and option D. The Oversight Committee sided with one expert option C as the correct answer.
Question 93: For another question of the same passage, the Expert Committee again gave a split opinion, and the Oversight Committee agreed with the answer chosen by one expert and changed the answer to option C.
Question 91: In the next question of the same passage, the Oversight Committee did not give its opinion.
Question 114: The Expert Committee declared that option D is the correct answer. Meanwhile, the Oversight Committee did not assess the question.
Question 115: The Expert Committee declared option A as the correct answer. The Oversight Committee did not assess the question.
Question 116: It was argued that a mistaken reference to question 115 appeared across all sets of the CLAT UG 2025 exam. However, the serial number of questions differed in each set of the paper. The Expert Committee determined option B as correct, but the Oversight Committee did not assess the question.
Petitioners and many candidates await the court’s decision on the CLAT UG 2025 results, and successful candidates who agree with the CLAT final answer key 2025 are preparing to intervene. One candidate told the court on April 9 that they are supporting the Consortium’s stand. During the CLAT 2025 Delhi HC hearings, the court questioned the paper-setters and the composition of committees reviewing objections in Logical and Legal Reasoning, stating, "You say questions are made by experts. For legal questions, GK, we understand. For logical and quantitative questions, they are part of maths, you do not teach maths. Then who sets these questions?". Regardless of the verdict, the Consortium must improve its objections process and ensure that qualified individuals set the paper and review the candidates' objections.
Hello ,
As per your mentioned query , it is possible to crack CLAT exam in 7 months if the preparation will be done with dedication and consistency. To start the preparation i am sharing some tips i hope this helps you :
To know more , kindly go through the given link:
https://law.careers360.com/articles/how-prepare-for-clat
Good luck !
Books for CLAT preparation:
1)Objective General English by N.Khurmi and George
2)General knowledge by Lucent Publications
3) Legal awareness and Legal reasoning by Pearson
4) Verbal and Non-verbal reasoning by R.S.Aggrawal
5)Quantitative aptitude by R.S.Aggrawal
Based on your score of 42/120 in the CLAT 2026 mock test, it's difficult to provide an exact rank as the rank depends on the overall performance of candidates. However, with a score like this, you may expect a rank in the mid to lower range, potentially beyond 2000, but this can vary.
If you scored 42/120 in a mock CLAT test for 2026, your estimated rank would be around 32,500 . This is based on a general distribution of marks. However, the actual rank can vary depending on the difficulty of the exam, the performance of other candidates, and the competition on the test day.
You can directly contact the admission office of SOA University to inquire about the possibility of applying for the BBA LLB course without having appeared for the SAAT or CLAT exams. They may offer alternative admission processes or counseling options for such cases.
A lawyer is a professional who practises law. An Individual in the lawyer career path defends his or her client's cases and makes arguments on his or her behalf in both criminal and civil proceedings. A lawyer may advise and assist clients on how they should handle their legal issues. An individual as a career in law in India is considered one of the most sought-after careers.
A lawyer's job requires inhibiting skills. It involves practical applications of abstract legal theories and knowledge to solve specialised individual problems or to facilitate the interests of those who hire a lawyer to perform legal services. Here, in this article, we will discuss how to become a lawyer after 10th, is lawyer a good career in India, and how to become a lawyer in India.
Are you searching for a civil lawyer job description? A civil lawyer is a law professional who deals with disputes that come under civil law. Civil law is applicable to issues related t property and business disputes, family disputes, and torts. A tort can be defined as a civil wrong that causes the other person harm or injury. A Civil lawyer handles disputes regarding personal injury, family relationships, real estate, and employment. A career as a civil lawyer requires working with government entities and business institutions.
Individuals in the human rights lawyer career path are legal professionals responsible for advocating for people whose inherent dignity has been violated and who have suffered a lot of injustice. They take cases to defend the human rights of minorities, vulnerable populations, the LGBTQI community, indigenous people and others.
A criminal lawyer is a lawyer who specialises in the field of crimes and punishments. Individuals who have been accused of committing a crime are guided by a criminal lawyer. Bail bond hearings, plea bargains, trials, dismissal hearings, appeals, and post-conviction procedures are all part of his or her work. Criminal law is the body of law that describes criminal acts, governs the arrest, prosecution, and trial of offenders, and defines the sentences and correctional options that are available to criminals.
Family lawyers are required to assist a client in resolving any family-related problem. In general, family lawyers operate as mediators between family members when conflicts arise. Individuals who opt for a career as Family Lawyer is charged with drafting prenuptial agreements to protect someone's financial interests prior to marriage, consulting on grounds for impeachment or civil union separation, and drafting separation agreements.
Cyber law careers deal with cyber law job opportunities concerning cybercrimes of all aspects such as cyberbullying, cyber frauds, cyber stalking, sharing personal information without consent, intellectual property and intellectual property, transactions, and freedom of speech.
An immigration lawyer is responsible for representing the individuals (clients) involved in the immigration process that includes legal, and illegal citizens and refugees who want to reside in the country, start a business or get employment.
A career as Government Lawyer is a professional who deals with law and requires to work for the government. He or she is required to work for either the state government or central government and is also known as Advocate General of the state and attorney general. A career as Government Lawyer requires one to work on behalf of government ministers and administrative staff. He or she gives legal advice and provides legal services in the public interest.
700+ Campus placements at top national and global law firms, corporates, and judiciaries
NAAC A+ Grade | Among top 100 universities of India (NIRF 2024) | 40 crore+ scholarships distributed
Ranked #28 amongst Institutions in India by NIRF | Ranked #1 in India for Academic Reputation by QS Rankings | 16.6 LPA Highest CTC | Last Date to Apply: 15th May
Internship Opportunities in leading Law Firms, Industry, Governmental Departments and NGOs
Ranked #1 Among all Private Indian Universities in QS Asia Rankings 2025 | Scholarships worth 210 CR
100+ Industry collaborations | 10+ Years of legacy