9 Questions around this concept.
Read the passage and answer the question that follow.
In the recent past, lawmakers have made efforts in order to simplify the numerous existing legislation pertaining to Labor Law in India. One such legislation that has been assented by the Parliament is the Code on Wages, 2019. Since there is a shortage of employment in rural areas, such workers migrate to cities. Due to their casual nature of work, this sector is often kept outside the ambit of labour laws. Minimum Wage is one such prominent aspect wherein the labour sector is witnessed to be in a disadvantageous position. To begin with, the International Labor Office defines the term “Minimum Wage” as the minimum amount of remuneration that an employer is required to pay wage earners for the work performed during a given period, and which cannot be reduced by collective agreement or an individual contract.
In order to take up this issue and rebut the contentions, the objects and positions of the labour rights and laws, as it is placed in the constitution, need first to be made clear. This piece, for various other reasons, is only concerned with the “unenforceable labour rights” contained under the Constitution of India; and makes arguments in favour of the court that how they have, over the years, endeavoured to give these provisions teeth to encroach upon the state’s arbitrariness and in turn to make them follow the constitutional mandate of social welfare. So, the question of whether India should adopt – in its substance – inter alia, the right to work, the right to a living wage, and the right to equal pay for equal work should be regarded as a question of law for the reason that it is a mandate addressed to the ‘State’ under relevant provisions of the Constitution of India. Besides, Articles 38, 39, 41, 42 and 43 have a noteworthy role in labour rights and laws, deriving their origin and philosophy from the Magna Carta of international industrial jurisprudence.
Question - Which among the following has been incorporated by the Code on Wages, 2019, which was lacking in the earlier labour laws?
Read the passage and answer the question that follow.
In the recent past, lawmakers have made efforts in order to simplify the numerous existing legislation pertaining to Labor Law in India. One such legislation that has been assented by the Parliament is the Code on Wages, 2019. Since there is a shortage of employment in rural areas, such workers migrate to cities. Due to their casual nature of work, this sector is often kept outside the ambit of labour laws. Minimum Wage is one such prominent aspect wherein the labour sector is witnessed to be in a disadvantageous position. To begin with, the International Labor Office defines the term “Minimum Wage” as the minimum amount of remuneration that an employer is required to pay wage earners for the work performed during a given period, and which cannot be reduced by collective agreement or an individual contract.
In order to take up this issue and rebut the contentions, the objects and positions of the labour rights and laws, as it is placed in the constitution, need first to be made clear. This piece, for various other reasons, is only concerned with the “unenforceable labour rights” contained under the Constitution of India; and makes arguments in favour of the court that how they have, over the years, endeavoured to give these provisions teeth to encroach upon the state’s arbitrariness and in turn to make them follow the constitutional mandate of social welfare. So, the question of whether India should adopt – in its substance – inter alia, the right to work, the right to a living wage, and the right to equal pay for equal work should be regarded as a question of law for the reason that it is a mandate addressed to the ‘State’ under relevant provisions of the Constitution of India. Besides, Articles 38, 39, 41, 42 and 43 have a noteworthy role in labour rights and laws, deriving their origin and philosophy from the Magna Carta of international industrial jurisprudence.
Question - From the following, determine the specific labor law statute which has been enacted for the purpose of safeguarding the rights and interests of the workers.
(1) To rectify the inequality of bargaining power between workers and employers through trade unions.
(2) To encourage collective bargaining from a position of relative equality.
Q3) Principle 1: According to Article 14 of the Indian Constitution, every citizen has a right to equality before the law and equal protection under the law.
Principle 2: According to the Code on Wages Act of 2019, there cannot be any salary discrimination based on a person's gender.
Facts: Both male and female engineers are employed by DEF Tech, a well-known tech company in Bengaluru. Despite having the same credentials and job duties as their male colleagues, female engineers are paid 20% less on average than their male counterparts, according to an internal audit. The CEO argues that this wage structure has always existed at the company, which explains the gap.
New: CLAT Previous Year Question Paper with Solutions
CLAT 2027: Mock Test | Sample Papers | Legal Current Affairs (March)
Admission Alert: Law Applications Open at Jindal Global Law School
Background and Purpose of the Code on Wages Act:
Provisions of the Code on Wages Act:
Indian Constitution and the Code on Wages Act:
The Code on Wages Act aligns with constitutional principles:
Case Law Example: Indian Bank Association v. Union of India (2020)
Practical Example:
Consider a manufacturing company with both male and female employees. The Code on Wages Act ensures:
"Stay in the loop. Receive exam news, study resources, and expert advice!"