Careers360 Logo
ask-icon
share
    CLAT Fourth Merit List 2026 (Postponed) - Download PDF here

    How do we protect the consumers for CLAT - Practice Questions & MCQ

    Edited By admin | Updated on Sep 25, 2023 25:26 PM | #CLAT

    Quick Facts

    • 10 Questions around this concept.

    Solve by difficulty

    Passage 

    Read the following passage and answer the question

    The consumer is the purpose and most powerful motivating force of production, yet at the same time, a consumer is an equally vulnerable segment of the whole marketing system. Attempts have been made to guard the interest of the consumer. In 1986, the Government of India enacted a comprehensive legislation-Consumer Protection Act, to safeguard the interest of the consumer. The Consumer Protection Act, 1986, applies to all goods and services, excluding goods for resale or for commercial purposes and services rendered free of charge and under a contract for personal service. The provisions of the Act are compensatory. It covers public, private, joint and cooperative sectors. The Act enshrines the rights of the consumer such as the right to safety, right to be informed, right to be heard, right to choose, right to seek redressal and right to consumer education. All of us are consumers of goods and services. For the Consumer Protection Act, the word "consumer" has been defined separately for "goods" and "services". For "goods", a consumer means a person belonging to the following categories:

    (i) One who buys or agrees to buy any goods for a consideration which has been paid or promised or partly paid and partly promised or under any system of deferred payment

    (ii) It includes any user of such goods other than the person who buys goods and such use is made with the approval of the purchaser. A person is not a consumer if he purchases goods for commercial or resale purposes. However, the word "commercial" does not include the use by consumers of goods bought and used by him exclusively to earn his livelihood, using self-employment. (i) One who hires or avails of any service or services for a consideration which has been paid or promised or partly paid and partly promised or under any system of deferred payment (ii) It includes any beneficiary of such service other than the one who hires or avails of the service for consideration and such services are availed with the approval of such person.

    Question

    Amit reached the railway station on time and waited for his super-fast train in which he booked tickets but the train was delayed for long hours without any reason. Decide.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Which type of anti-competitive practice involves two or more companies conspiring to fix prices, reduce competition, and allocate markets?

    Concepts Covered - 1

    How do we protect the consumers

    Ways to Protect Consumers:

    Right to Information:

    • Explanation: Consumers have the right to know what they are buying. Businesses must provide accurate and clear information about products and services so that consumers can make informed decisions.
    • Example: When you buy a packaged food item, you can find details about its ingredients, nutritional value, manufacturing date, and best-before date on the packaging. This helps you make choices based on your preferences and dietary needs.

    Anti-Competitive Practices:

    • Explanation: The Act prohibits businesses from engaging in unfair trade practices that deceive or mislead consumers. This includes false advertising, misleading claims, and deceptive packaging.
    • Example: Imagine a company advertises a skincare cream claiming it can instantly remove wrinkles. If the cream doesn't deliver the promised results, consumers can file complaints under the Act for deceptive advertising.

    Product Safety and Quality:

    • Explanation: Consumers have the right to safe and good-quality products. Businesses must ensure that their products meet safety standards and are free from defects that could harm consumers.
    • Example: If a car manufacturer sells vehicles with faulty brakes that can lead to accidents, they can be held accountable for any injuries caused due to the defects.

    Unfair Contracts:

    • Explanation: The Act protects consumers from unfair terms and conditions in contracts. Businesses cannot include clauses that unreasonably favor them and deprive consumers of their rights.
    • Example: Online services often come with terms and conditions that users must agree to. If a clause states that the company can change its services without notice and hold no responsibility, such a clause might be considered unfair and unenforceable under the Act.

    Redressal Mechanisms:

    • Explanation: The Act establishes Consumer Dispute Redressal Commissions to address consumer complaints. These commissions provide consumers with a platform to seek remedies for grievances against businesses.
    • Example: If you buy a faulty electronic gadget and the company refuses to repair or replace it, you can file a complaint with the appropriate Consumer Commission. They will investigate the matter and order appropriate compensation or relief.

    Case Law Example: Martin Burn Ltd. v. Corporation of Calcutta (1966):

    • Background:

    A building constructed by Martin Burn Ltd. collapsed, causing damage to nearby properties owned by the Corporation of Calcutta.

    • Key Issues:

    The main question was whether the construction company was responsible for the damages due to the building's collapse, focusing on the principle of negligence and duty of care.

    • Court's Decision:

    The Supreme Court established the principle of "strict liability" for activities that are inherently dangerous. Businesses engaged in such activities have an absolute duty to exercise caution to prevent harm, even if they take precautions.

    • Impact:

    This case set a precedent that businesses involved in inherently hazardous activities are held to a high standard of care. It extends to ensuring product and service safety. If such businesses fail to prevent harm, they can be held liable for damages, even if precautions were taken.

    • Consumer Protection Connection:

    The case underscores the responsibility of businesses to ensure consumer safety. It highlights that businesses must take reasonable steps to minimize risks to consumers. This aligns with consumer protection, emphasizing the duty to safeguard consumer interests.

    • Conclusion:

    Martin Burn Ltd. v. Corporation of Calcutta (1966) established the principle of strict liability for businesses engaged in dangerous activities. This principle emphasizes the importance of protecting consumers and underscores the need for businesses to prioritize safety, contributing to the broader concept of consumer protection.



     

    "Stay in the loop. Receive exam news, study resources, and expert advice!"

    Get Answer to all your questions