Careers360 Logo
ask-icon
share
    CLAT Fourth Merit List 2026 (Postponed) - Download PDF here

    Meaning of Defamation, Its Examples, Types, Defences and Exceptions for CLAT - Practice Questions & MCQ

    Edited By admin | Updated on Sep 25, 2023 25:47 PM | #CLAT

    Quick Facts

    • 10 Questions around this concept.

    Solve by difficulty

    Read the given passage very carefully and answer the questions.

    Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person is known as defamation. Defamation is the act of making untrue statements about another which damages his/her reputation. It is a statement that injures someone's reputation. Defamation is the act of saying false things in order to make people have a bad opinion of someone. Defamation may be defined as a communication to some person, other than the person defamed, of the matter which tends to lower the plaintiff in the estimation of right-thinking persons or to deter them from associating or dealing with him. Defamation is a wrong done by a person to another's reputation by words, written or spoken, sign or other visible representation. Defamation is of two kinds Libel and Slander. If the statement is made in writing and published in some permanent and visible form, then defamation is called Libel. Whereas, if the statement is made by some spoken words then the defamation is called Slander.

    Defamation may be a civil charge or a criminal charge under Sections 499 and 500 of IPC. Section 499 Of IPC: Whoever by words, either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs or by visible representations, makes or publishes any imputation concerning any person intending to harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm, the reputation of such person is said to defame that person. Section 500 of IPC: Whoever defames another shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years or with a fine or both. A victim, to win a lawsuit, has to prove that a false statement was made and published, and the same caused injury to the reputation of the victim. However, there are defences which can be raised such as a true statement or if it was a fair and honest comment or criticism made in the public interest.

    Question: A college student while browsing online came across disparaging information about a fellow student from his class. Thinking it would be funny, he circulated the same among his friends and soon it became viral. He later came to know that the information was fake. The victim filed for defamation under Section 499 IPC and won. Was the court right?

    Read the given passage very carefully and answer the questions.

    Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person is known as defamation. Defamation is the act of making untrue statements about another which damages his/her reputation. It is a statement that injures someone's reputation. Defamation is the act of saying false things in order to make people have a bad opinion of someone. Defamation may be defined as a communication to some person, other than the person defamed, of the matter which tends to lower the plaintiff in the estimation of right-thinking persons or to deter them from associating or dealing with him. Defamation is a wrong done by a person to another's reputation by words, written or spoken, sign or other visible representation. Defamation is of two kinds Libel and Slander. If the statement is made in writing and published in some permanent and visible form, then defamation is called Libel. Whereas, if the statement is made by some spoken words then the defamation is called Slander.

    Defamation may be a civil charge or a criminal charge under Sections 499 and 500 of IPC. Section 499 Of IPC: Whoever by words, either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs or by visible representations, makes or publishes any imputation concerning any person intending to harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm, the reputation of such person is said to defame that person. Section 500 of IPC: Whoever defames another shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years or with a fine or both. A victim, to win a lawsuit, has to prove that a false statement was made and published, and the same caused injury to the reputation of the victim. However, there are defences which can be raised such as a true statement or if it was a fair and honest comment or criticism made in the public interest.

    Question: An angry neighbour after having enough of the noise pollution emanating from Rohit's house, made a poster referring to Rohit as a son of a donkey and emailed it to him. Can Rohit successfully file a suit for defamation against the neighbour?

    A is a newspaper editor. B is a cartoonist and published a cartoon of C an official sitting with a bundle of money. A was held liable for defamation.

    A is a writer of books. B a book critic, says A's book is indecent he must have a weak character. Decide

    Concepts Covered - 1

    DV Act 2005

    In the discussion of "Cruelty Caused by Husband," we delve into the Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act), a pivotal legal framework aimed at safeguarding women from various forms of abuse and cruelty within their domestic relationships, particularly marriages.

    Understanding the Domestic Violence Act, 2005:

    • The DV Act is a comprehensive law that recognizes and addresses different dimensions of domestic violence, including physical, emotional, verbal, economic, and sexual abuse.
    • Its objective is to provide women with a legal mechanism to seek protection, support, and remedies when they face mistreatment within the confines of their homes.

    Key Elements of the DV Act:

    • Wide Definition of Domestic Violence: The Act has an expansive scope, encompassing violence not only inflicted by husbands but also by other family members.
    • Rights and Reliefs: It grants women a range of rights, such as the right to continue residing in their shared household, protection orders against abuse, financial support, access to medical assistance, and more.

    Examples:

    • Physical Abuse: If a husband physically assaults his wife, causing her harm or injury, it falls under the purview of the DV Act.
    • Emotional Abuse: The Act acknowledges consistent verbal insults, humiliation, and emotional distress caused by family members as forms of abuse.
    • Economic Abuse: If a husband exercises control over the woman's finances, denying her access to money or financial independence, it constitutes economic abuse under the DV Act.

    Case Law: Indra Sarma v. V.K.V. Sarma (2013)

    In the Indra Sarma v. V.K.V. Sarma case, the following key points were highlighted:

    • Comprehensive Protection: The Supreme Court emphasized that the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, was enacted to provide comprehensive protection to women against various forms of abuse within domestic relationships.
    • Addressing Abuse: The case underscored the Act's intent to address a wide range of abuses, including physical, emotional, verbal, economic, and sexual, recognizing the multi-dimensional nature of domestic violence.
    • Remedies for Victims: The court reiterated that the Act offers remedies and legal recourse to women who suffer abuse, granting them the means to seek protection and redressal.
    • Prevention and Support: The case highlighted the Act's role in not only addressing ongoing abuse but also preventing future instances of violence and providing support to victims.
    • Promoting Gender Equality: The court's ruling demonstrated the Act's alignment with constitutional principles of gender equality, ensuring that women are safeguarded from abuse and mistreatment within their homes.
    • Balancing Rights: While emphasizing women's protection, the case also recognized the importance of striking a balance between the rights of victims and the accused, ensuring a fair and just legal process.
    • Empowerment through Law: The Indra Sarma case reaffirmed the significance of legal mechanisms like the DV Act in empowering women to assert their rights and seek justice in cases of domestic violence.

    Indian Constitution and Case Law Studies:

    • Article 15: This constitutional provision prohibits discrimination based on gender. The DV Act aligns with this constitutional mandate by recognizing women's rights and providing them with legal recourse against domestic violence.
    • Article 21: Guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. The DV Act upholds a woman's right to live free from violence and abuse within the confines of her own home.

    "Stay in the loop. Receive exam news, study resources, and expert advice!"

    Get Answer to all your questions