CLAT 2027 Mock Test (FREE): 1 New Mock Test Every Week

CLAT 2027 Mock Test Series: Free PDF

The CLAT 2027 mock test PDF is available for candidates to practice questions according to the format and style of the Common Law Admission Test. The following sample contains CLAT 2027 practice questions for every section.

CLAT 2027 English Mock Test: (Weekly)

CLAT 2027 Mock Test Questions

The following sample questions are designed to help candidates practice passage-based reasoning. Each question has four answer options: the correct answer and an explanation.

Passage 1: Legal Reasoning

The Constitution of India provides a framework for the relationship between the Governor and the State Legislature. Under Article 200, when a bill passed by a state legislature is presented to the Governor, the Governor may give assent, withhold assent, or reserve the Bill for the consideration of the President. In certain circumstances, the governor may return a Bill to the legislature for reconsideration.

The Supreme Court has examined the constitutional limits on a governor's powers when dealing with state bills. In the case concerning the Governor of Tamil Nadu, the Court addressed the issue of prolonged inaction on Bills passed by the State Legislature. The judgment emphasised that a governor cannot use inaction as a means of indefinitely delaying the legislative process. Constitutional authorities are expected to act in accordance with the Constitution and cannot exercise their powers in a manner that frustrates its purpose.

The dispute raised important questions about the balance between the constitutional position of the Governor and the democratic authority of an elected State Legislature. It also highlighted the role of judicial review in ensuring that constitutional powers are exercised within legal limits.

Questions

1. What is the main constitutional issue discussed in the passage?

(A) The power of Parliament to dissolve a State Legislature
(B) The limits on a Governor’s powers when dealing with Bills passed by a State Legislature
(C) The power of the President to appoint High Court judges
(D) The authority of a Governor to amend the Constitution

Answer: (B)

Explanation: The passage focuses on the Governor’s constitutional powers regarding State Bills and the limits on prolonged inaction.

2. According to the passage, which Article deals with the Governor’s action on a Bill passed by the State Legislature?

(A) Article 32
(B) Article 123
(C) Article 200
(D) Article 356

Answer: (C)

Explanation: Article 200 deals with the Governor’s options when a Bill passed by the State Legislature is presented for assent.

3. Why is indefinite inaction by a Governor constitutionally problematic, according to the passage?

(A) It automatically dissolves the State Legislature
(B) It can frustrate the legislative process
(C) It transfers all legislative powers to the President
(D) It prevents courts from exercising judicial review

Answer: (B)

Explanation: The passage explains that prolonged inaction can obstruct the legislative process and undermine the purpose of constitutional governance.

4. What role does judicial review play in the situation described?

(A) It allows courts to ensure that constitutional powers are exercised within legal limits
(B) It enables courts to pass every Bill introduced in a State Legislature
(C) It gives courts the power to appoint Governors
(D) It removes the Governor’s constitutional role entirely

Answer: (A)

Explanation: Judicial review allows courts to examine whether constitutional authorities have acted within the limits of their powers.

5. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?

(A) Governors have unlimited discretion over State Bills
(B) Constitutional authorities must exercise their powers consistently with constitutional requirements
(C) State Legislatures have no role in the law-making process
(D) Judicial review applies only to disputes between private individuals

Answer: (B)

Explanation: The passage emphasises that constitutional powers cannot be exercised arbitrarily or in a manner that defeats constitutional principles.

Passage 2: Logical Reasoning

On the night of October 12, the Sunburst Medallion was stolen from a highly secured display case in a city museum. The theft occurred sometime between the museum’s closing at 10:00 PM and the night guard completing his final round at 1:00 AM. Three suspects were identified, all of whom had recently been dismissed from their museum jobs.

The first suspect, Arun, claimed that he had been at home throughout the night. However, a neighbour reported seeing him near the museum shortly before midnight. The second suspect, Beena, said she had left the city earlier that evening, but a transport record placed her at a nearby railway station after 11:00 PM. The third suspect, Charan, stated that he had been working at a restaurant. The restaurant manager confirmed that Charan was present, although the manager could not confirm whether he had remained there for the entire night.

Investigators also discovered that the display case had been opened without visible damage. This suggested that the person responsible might have had access to the museum’s security arrangements or knowledge of how the case operated. However, the available information did not conclusively establish which suspect had committed the theft.

Questions

1. What is the strongest conclusion that can be drawn from the passage?

(A) Arun definitely stole the medallion
(B) Beena definitely planned the theft
(C) The available evidence raises suspicion but does not conclusively identify the thief
(D) Charan could not have committed the theft

Answer: (C)

Explanation: The passage provides information about all three suspects but does not establish the guilt of any one of them conclusively.

2. Which detail most strongly suggests that the thief may have had specialised knowledge or access?

(A) The suspects had recently lost their jobs
(B) The theft occurred after the museum closed
(C) The display case was opened without visible damage
(D) The medallion was displayed in a museum

Answer: (C)

Explanation: Opening the display case without visible damage suggests that the person responsible may have known how the security arrangements worked.

3. Why does the neighbour’s statement create suspicion about Arun?

(A) It contradicts his claim that he remained at home throughout the night
(B) It proves that he had the key to the display case
(C) It confirms that he was inside the museum at 1:00 AM
(D) It establishes that he sold the medallion

Answer: (A)

Explanation: The neighbour reportedly saw Arun near the museum, which conflicts with his claim that he stayed at home all night. However, this does not prove that he committed the theft.

4. What does the transport record concerning Beena establish?

(A) She stole the medallion
(B) She was at a nearby railway station after 11:00 PM
(C) She had entered the museum before it closed
(D) She had access to the display case

Answer: (B)

Explanation: The transport record establishes her reported location at a particular time. It does not independently prove her involvement in the theft.

5. Which additional piece of evidence would be most useful in identifying the person responsible?

(A) The number of visitors who attended the museum that month
(B) The price at which the medallion was originally purchased
(C) Security footage or access records showing who entered the display area during the relevant period
(D) The number of employees working in the museum during the previous year

Answer: (C)

Explanation: Security footage or access records could help establish who was present in the relevant area during the period in which the theft occurred.

Note: The passage is taken from the CLAT 2026 question paper. The mock test PDF is designed in a similar format and pattern to the CLAT 2026 question paper.