CLAT Constitutional Law PYQs: Most Repeated Constitution

Most Repeated Constitution PYQs in CLAT Exam

The Constitution of India is the single most important subject in CLAT 2027, consistently contributing 20–25% of the entire CLAT 2027 exam pattern. Questions are direct, factual, and largely repeated from CLAT Constitutional Law PYQs.

1. How is online defamation described in the passage?
A. Any false statement published offline
B. A statement harming a person’s reputation on digital platforms
C. A criminal offence under IPC only
D. A legal right protected under IT Act

Explanation: Online defamation specifically refers to false or harmful statements made on digital platforms that damage a person’s reputation.

2. What is the significance of Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000?
A. It criminalises online speech
B. It provides immunity to intermediaries for third-party content under certain conditions
C. It protects only government websites
D. It bans defamatory posts on social media

Explanation: Section 79 grants “safe harbor” protection to intermediaries (like social media platforms) from liability for third-party content, provided they act as per rules and remove unlawful content when notified.

3. The PRP Bill defines “specified authority” as:
A. Chief Justice of India
B. District Magistrate
C. Prime Minister
D. Press Council of India

Explanation: For regulatory purposes, the “specified authority” in the PRP Bill is the District Magistrate who oversees registration and compliance of periodicals.

4. In Shreya Singhal v. Union of India, the Supreme Court held that:
A. Section 66A of the IT Act is constitutional
B. Section 66A of the IT Act is unconstitutional for being vague and overbroad
C. Only offline defamation is punishable
D. Freedom of expression has no restrictions online

Explanation: The Supreme Court struck down Section 66A, stating it violated Article 19(1)(a) by being vague and overbroad, threatening free speech online.

5. How does the Indian legal system balance the Right to Freedom of Expression?
A. By allowing unlimited speech without any restriction
B. By restricting all online content
C. By imposing reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2) for public order, decency, or morality
D. By allowing courts to ignore defamatory content

Explanation: Article 19(1)(a) grants freedom of speech, but Article 19(2) allows “reasonable restrictions” for public order, decency, morality, etc., balancing rights and responsibilities.

6. What must a plaintiff prove about a defamatory statement in India?
A. The statement is true
B. The statement harms their reputation
C. The statement was made in private
D. The statement was made by a government official

Explanation: In defamation cases, the plaintiff must show that the statement was published and caused reputational harm. Truth is a defense, not a requirement to prove.

7. What is the role of intermediaries in the context of online defamation cases?
A. They are always liable for defamatory content
B. They must remove content upon receiving a notice to retain immunity under Section 79
C. They decide the constitutionality of content
D. They can ignore all complaints

Explanation: Intermediaries are protected from liability if they act promptly to remove unlawful content once notified. Failure to do so can attract liability.

8. The PRP Bill defines “newspaper” as:
A. Any digital blog
B. A periodical of loose-folded sheets published at regular intervals
C. Only daily newspapers
D. Social media posts

Explanation: The Press and Registration of Periodicals (PRP) Bill specifies a “newspaper” as a periodical publication, traditionally printed, and not social media content.

9. Who among the following is NOT eligible to publish a newspaper under the PRP Bill?
A. A citizen of India
B. A minor below 18 years
C. A person declared of unsound mind
D. All of the above

Explanation: The PRP Bill restricts publication to persons who are legally competent—minors and those of unsound mind are disqualified.

10. Which of the following is a threat to the freedom of press?
A. Government-imposed censorship without procedure
B. Publication of truthful news
C. Independent editorial policies
D. Freedom to circulate newspapers

Explanation: Arbitrary government censorship or restrictions without due procedure threaten press freedom, which is otherwise implied under Article 19(1)(a).

Most Repeated CLAT Constitutional Landmark Judgments

Below is a detailed list of the most repeated Constitutional Law landmark judgments for CLAT. These cases are frequently asked across CLAT UG passages and questions because they form the backbone of Indian constitutional jurisprudence.

CLAT 2027 Constitutional Law Revision Sheet

A quick revision sheet covering key Constitutional Law topics for CLAT 2027, including Freedom of Speech, online defamation, Shreya Singhal case, and press regulations. Designed for last-minute prep with short explanations and high-yield CLAT Constitutional Law PYQs.