The Allahabad High Court has ordered the Consortium of NLUs to revise the CLAT 2026 merit list in an answer key dispute. On February 3, 2026, a single bench judge of Justice Vivek Saran J, the Allahabad HC delivered its judgment in the legal battle between Avneesh Gupta (Minor) vs. Consortium of National Law Universities. In his petition, Gupta alleged that the Consortium of NLUs did not consider three of his objections in the CLAT 2026 final answer key. Meanwhile, the Consortium of NLUs argued that its headquarters were situated in Karnataka, and this does not come under the Allahabad HC’s jurisdiction. On the other hand, the Allahabad HC noted that the exam was held in Ghaziabad and the court held its jurisdiction under Article 26.
Category | Details from Judgment |
Case Title | Avneesh Gupta (Minor) vs. Consortium of National Law Universities |
Court | High Court of Judicature at Allahabad |
Judgment Delivered On | February 3, 2026 |
Writ Petition No. | WRIT-C No. 45517 of 2025 |
Judicial Officer | Hon’ble Vivek Saran, J. |
Petitioner | Avneesh Gupta (Minor) |
Respondent | Consortium of National Law Universities |
Petitioner’s Counsel | In Person |
Respondent’s Counsel | Avneesh Tripathi |
In his petition to the Allahabad HC, petitioner Avneesh Gupta sought relief described in five points. The petitioner sought relief, alleging that the Consortium of NLUs did not consider three objections he filed in the final answer key. Here are the reliefs that the petitioner sought from the Allahabad HC:
Writ directing the respondent to withdraw the incorrect questions in the CLAT exam 2026 .
Award appropriate marks for those questions and modify the petitioner’s rank in the CLAT 2026 merit list.
Issue a writ to review objections properly.
Issue direction to publish the corrected merit list and rank list.
Recalculate the petitioner’s marks as per the corrected answer key.
The petitioner, Avneesh Gupta, argued that the rejection of three of his objections was invalid. Gupta argued that despite the Expert Committee supporting his answers, the final answer key did not reflect the corrections. This action of the Consortium of the NLUs led to his rank going down and hampered his admission chances.
While the case was being heard in the Allahabad HC, both parties argued through their respective counsels. The Consortium of NLUs initially argued that since its headquarters were located in Karnataka, this case did not come under the jurisdiction of the Allahabad HC. The Allahabad HC under Article 26 came under its jurisdiction since the exam was held in Ghaziabad. Furthermore, the Consortium argued that the valuation and correctness of questions lie within the expert domain, and the court should not re-evaluate exam answers. The High Court agreed to this, but said there was a procedural infirmity.
The following questions were objected to by the petitioner, and the expert committee made the following observations:
Question No. (Booklet-C) | Expert Committee Opinion | Oversight Committee Decision |
6 | Option ‘B’ is correct | Not altered |
9 | Both options ‘B’ & ‘D’ correct | Oversight Committee retained only ‘B’ without reasons |
13 | Option ‘C’ is correct | Not altered |
In its judgment, the Allahabad HC directed the Consortium of NLUs to revise the CLAT 2026 merit list. The detailed judgment read, “In such view of the matter, the respondent directed to revise the merit list by awarding marks against question no. 9 of booklet-C (corresponding to question no. 91 of booklet-A) and to all other questions which correspond to the same in.”
“In absence of any reason been given for overruling the decision of the Expert Committee by the Oversight Committee with respect to question no. 91 of booklet-A (correspond to question no. 9 of bookletC), the same is hereby quashed and the answers of the Expert Committee are sustained.”
The court further ordered that no changes be made in the admissions already done. However, the Consortium of NLUs must consider the revised merit list for further admission process.
On Question asked by student community
Dear Student,
CLAT PG stands for Common Law Admission Test Postgraduate. CLAT PG is a national-level entrance examination for admission to LLM programmes offered by participating National Law Universities (NLUs) and other institutions.
Read more at : CLAT Full Form
Hey there,
If you mean CLAT eligibility for admission to 5-year LLB courses, there is no fixed CLAT score/rank that guarantees eligibility. You must first meet the basic Class 12 eligibility criteria, and admission is based on your CLAT rank, category, preferences, and counselling cut-offs.
For NLUs, a better rank
HI VEERENDRAPRASAD ,
Please refer to the following study resources for CLAT 2027 Logical Reasoning
1. How To Score 25+ In CLAT 2026 Logical Reasoning Section https://law.careers360.com/download/ebooks/how-score-25-in-clat-logical-reasoning-section
2. CLAT 2026 Logical Reasoning Question Paper with Solutions: https://law.careers360.com/download/ebooks/clat-2026-logical-reasoning-question-paper-solutions
3. CLAT Logical Reasoning Questions: https://law.careers360.com/articles/clat-logical-reasoning-questions
4. How to prepare for CLAT logical
Hello Student,
Yes, if you have already completed your graduation, you can still appear for CLAT. The important thing is whether you want CLAT UG or CLAT PG:
Hi Keerthi,
You can download the CLAT previous years' question papers.
https://law.careers360.com/download/sample-papers/clat-last-five-year-question-papers-answer-key
If you need any other resources, please let us know.
Among top 100 Universities Globally in the Times Higher Education (THE) Interdisciplinary Science Rankings 2026
Admissions open for B.A. LL.B. (Hons.), B.B.A. LL.B. (Hons.) and LL.B Program (3 Years) | School of Law, MRU ranked No. 1 in Law Schools of Excellence in India by GHRDC (2023)
NAAC A+ Accredited | Among top 2% Universities Globally (QS World University Rankings 2026)
Last Date to Apply: 20th August | Ranked #18 amongst Institutions in India by NIRF | Get Upto 100% Scholarships | Spot Admissions via CUET
Approved by BCI | Ranked #4 among Law Institutes in UP | NAAC A+ Accredited
In-house judicial coaching | Proven success in National Moot Court Competitions