How to Score 25+ in CLAT Logical Reasoning? Preparation Tips for CLAT 2026

How to Score 25+ in CLAT Logical Reasoning?

In the CLAT logical reasoning section, questions will be asked from a series of short passages of about 450 words each. It evaluates the problem-solving skills of the students.

• This section now primarily focuses on critical thinking and passage-based questions.

• Candidates can master puzzle practice, seating arrangement, and logical sequencing to improve their analytical skills.

• Practising mock papers can help build problem-solving skills

• Read the questions carefully and understand what has been asked, identify the conclusions and premises.

• Strengthen your deductive reasoning skills.

Top Types of Logical Reasoning Questions in CLAT

Here’s a sample passage drawn from the logical reasoning section of the CLAT 2025 question paper, followed by a few questions. It will give a clear idea about what to expect in the exam.

The municipal council of Sundarpur has decided to ban single-use plastic items (such as shopping bags, disposable cutlery and straws) within the city limits starting next month. The council cites environmental concerns: recent surveys show that clogged drains—largely due to plastic waste—have increased flooding during monsoon months, and plastic litter has harmed local birdlife. To ease the transition, the council plans a three-tier scheme: (1) free distribution of 1 reusable cloth bag per household for the first month, (2) a subsidy for small vendors to buy biodegradable alternatives, and (3) a public awareness campaign about reuse and recycling.

Opposition members argue the ban will disproportionately affect low-income households and street vendors who depend on cheap single-use plastics. They contend that alternatives are still expensive despite subsidies, that enforcement will burden poorly staffed sanitary departments, and that banning plastic without a parallel improvement in waste collection and drainage infrastructure is misguided. A third group — several environmental NGOs — supports the ban but urges the council to set measurable targets (for reduction in litter and drainage blockages) and to monitor implementation closely.

The council insists the ban is urgent because the city’s flooding and ecological damage are worsening, and because waiting for perfect infrastructure would only delay action while damage continues.

Below are questions based on the passage. Each question has four options; the correct option is stated with a brief solution and explanation.

Q1. Which one of the following can be most reasonably inferred from the passage?

A. The municipality will prosecute vendors who continue to use single-use plastic after the ban.
B. The free cloth bag distribution will completely eliminate the need for single-use plastics.
C. The council believes immediate action is preferable to waiting for full infrastructural upgrades.
D. Environmental NGOs oppose any form of subsidy for biodegradable alternatives.

Correct option: C

Solution / Explanation: The passage says the council insists the ban is urgent and that waiting for perfect infrastructure would delay action — this directly supports C. A is not stated or implied (prosecution is not mentioned). B is too strong — distribution of one bag per household for a month cannot be inferred to "completely eliminate" need. D contradicts the passage (NGOs support the ban and want measurable targets; no opposition to subsidies is stated).

Q2. Which assumption underlies the council’s three-tier plan?

A. Biodegradable alternatives are already widely available in the market at low cost.
B. Providing a free reusable bag and subsidies will help reduce single-use plastic usage.
C. Street vendors refuse to change unless legally forced.
D. Flooding during monsoon months has nothing to do with waste collection.

Correct option: B

Solution / Explanation: The council's plan (free bag, subsidies, awareness) is intended to ease the transition away from single-use plastics — this relies on the assumption that these measures will help reduce plastic use (B). A is false/not necessary (plan includes subsidy implying availability may be limited or costly). C is not needed for the plan. D contradicts the passage which links clogged drains (waste) to flooding.

Q3. Which statement, if true, would most strengthen the opposition’s argument that the ban will disproportionately affect low-income households?

A. Studies show that after subsidies the price of biodegradable cutlery is equal to current plastic prices.
B. A recent survey reveals that 70% of low-income households cannot afford reusable bags at their current market price.
C. The NGOs propose measurable targets for litter reduction.
D. The city has increased spending on drainage maintenance this financial year.

Correct option: B

Solution / Explanation: B directly supports the opposition’s claim about low-income households being unable to afford alternatives. A would weaken the opposition (if prices are equal, burden is less). C is unrelated. D would weaken their logistical argument that waste infrastructure is inadequate.

Q4. Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the council’s insistence that immediate action (the ban) is necessary?

A. Historical data shows that cities that improved drainage before banning plastics experienced fewer floods.
B. Vendors received a timely subsidy enabling them to buy biodegradable options.
C. The public awareness campaign achieved 80% recognition in a pilot area.
D. The municipal council issued a detailed enforcement plan for the ban.

Correct option: A

Solution / Explanation: If evidence shows that improving drainage first reduces floods, then the council’s claim that immediate banning is necessary (even without infrastructure upgrades) is undermined—this weakens their urgency argument. B, C, and D support or facilitate the ban rather than weaken the urgency argument.

Q5. Which of the following principles, if accepted, would make the opposition’s argument logically valid?

A. Policies that create short-term economic hardship for vulnerable groups are unjust unless compensatory measures fully mitigate hardship.
B. Environmental harm always outweighs economic concerns.
C. Urgent policies must always be implemented immediately, regardless of consequences.
D. Public awareness campaigns are always ineffective.

Correct option: A

Solution / Explanation: The opposition claims the ban disproportionately affects low-income groups — principle A would justify rejecting the ban unless the council fully mitigates hardship, making the opposition’s argument valid. B and C contradict the opposition’s stance. D is unrelated and false.

Q6. Complete the following sentence so it reflects the passage accurately:

"If the council implements the ban but fails to improve waste collection and drainage, ______."

A. flooding and ecological damage will definitely cease.
B. NGOs will withdraw support for the ban immediately.
C. the intended environmental benefits of the ban may be reduced or delayed.
D. the price of biodegradable goods will automatically fall.

Correct option: C

Solution / Explanation: The passage notes opposition’s point that banning without improving waste collection/drainage is misguided — implying benefits could be reduced or delayed. A is opposite. B is not stated. D is unrelated.

Q7. Which one of the following statements does follow logically from the passage?

A. The council’s plan guarantees no vendor will lose business because of the ban.
B. The opposition expects enforcement to be costless and easy.
C. The NGOs support measurable monitoring of the ban’s impact.
D. Flooding in Sundarpur is solely caused by single-use plastics.

Correct option: C

Solution / Explanation: The passage explicitly says several environmental NGOs support the ban but urge the council to set measurable targets and monitor implementation — that's C. A is not guaranteed. B contradicts opposition’s claim that enforcement will burden sanitary departments. D is too strong; passage links plastics as a major contributor, not the sole cause.

Q8. Given the concerns of all three groups (council, opposition, NGOs), which of the following is the most balanced and practical policy response?

A. Immediately impose a total ban and criminalize all use of plastic, postponing subsidies and awareness campaigns.
B. Abandon the ban and rely solely on infrastructure upgrades over the next five years.
C. Phase the ban: start with awareness + free reusable bags, expand vendor subsidies, simultaneously accelerate targeted waste-collection and drainage improvements, and set measurable targets for review after six months.
D. Leave the situation unchanged to observe natural improvements.

Correct option: C

Solution / Explanation: C integrates the council’s urgency and the NGOs’ demand for measurable targets while addressing the opposition’s concern about infrastructure and economic impact by phasing and combining subsidies and infrastructure improvements — therefore the most balanced practical response. A and B are extreme and ignore key concerns. D is passive and unhelpful.

CLAT Logical Reasoning MCQs

Key Skills Required for CLAT Logical Reasoning

Here are the Key Skills to solve the logical reasoning section in CLAT 2026.

• Work on developing analytical and critical thinking by indulging in solving puzzles and other exercises that require you to apply some logic.

• Understand the CLAT logical reasoning syllabus and work on problems and topics that are included in the syllabus.

• Solve previous year question papers and sample papers that will generate familiarity with the exam pattern and also improve solving speed.

• Organise the exam preparation by creating a study plan and sticking to it so that goals can be achieved faster.

Books for CLAT 2026 Logical Reasoning Syllabus

Given below is a list of books for the CLAT logical reasoning 2026 syllabus. The list is not exhaustive, and candidates must consider various factors such as the author, publication, syllabus followed, and availability of practice question papers before finalising the books.

List of CLAT 2026 Logical Reasoning Books

Mistakes To Avoid For CLAT 2026 Logical Reasoning Section

Below are some of the common mistakes that should be avoided while preparing for the CLAT Logical Reasoning Section

• Rushing through the questions: It's simple to become overwhelmed by time constraints, yet doing so can result in thoughtless errors. Before attempting the answer, always allow enough time to thoroughly study the question and comprehend its prerequisites. Making the incorrect decision is frequently the result of omitting the analysis stage.

• Ignoring Keywords: In questions involving logical reasoning, keywords are essential for determining the best course of action. Words like "always," "never," "except," and "most likely" can cause you to think incorrectly and provide inaccurate replies.

• Lack of Practice: Reasonable. It takes a lot of effort to become comfortable with the many sorts and patterns of reasoning questions. Ignoring the value of practice can result in a lack of accuracy and speed in the real test. You can identify trends and enhance your performance by practising frequently using past year papers and mock exams.

• Ignoring Time Management: A lot of students devote excessive amounts of time to a single, challenging subject. They can be discouraged from trying other, simpler queries as a result. Practice your pace and learn to move on if a question seems too time-consuming to avoid this.

• The format of the question is misunderstood: logical reasoning involves a variety of inquiry kinds, such as syllogisms, analogies, and blood connections. Answers can be incorrect if the format is not understood or if the question is not interpreted correctly. Make sure you are well-versed in each category and how to solve it before the test.

• Overcomplicating Simple Questions: Students occasionally overthink or include extra steps in response to seemingly simple problems. Without making things too complicated, it's critical to maintain attention on the fundamental reasoning. After reading the question, always follow your gut and don't question yourself.

• Ignoring blunders: Ignoring blunders after completing practice questions or mock exams can prevent progress. You'll perform much better in the future if you know why you made a mistake and how to tackle the issue differently.

How To Attempt CLAT 2026 Logical Reasoning Questions

It is important to know how to attempt the questions for the CLAT 2026 Logical Reasoning Section. Below are the tips on how to attempt CLAT 2026 Logical Reasoning Questions.

• Know the Type of Question: In CLAT, logical reasoning usually includes syllogisms, puzzles, seating arrangements, blood relations, analogies, and critical thinking. Quickly determine the question type so that the best strategy can be used.

• Time management: Give each question a certain amount of time, often one to one and a half minutes. If a question seems complicated or time-consuming, ignore it and return to it later.

• Break Down the Question: Carefully read the entire question, emphasising important details, like puzzles or seating arrangements. Then, if required, make a table or diagram to assist in visualising the issue more clearly.

• Practice Common Patterns: A lot of questions in logical reasoning have similar structures. Practising from past years' papers regularly will help you identify these trends and solve problems more quickly.

• Concentrate on Removing Wrong Answers: When answering multiple-choice questions, start by removing the alternatives that are blatantly erroneous. If you must guess, this raises the likelihood that you will select the correct response.

• Remain composed and logical: Using a methodical mental process is the essence of logical reasoning. Do not overcomplicate the solution or draw hasty judgments. Follow sensible procedures and have faith in the process.

• Mock Exams and Practice: It's crucial to regularly practice with mock exams. This improves your speed and accuracy in addition to helping you comprehend the exam pattern.