Careers360 Logo
ask-icon
share
    CLAT 2026 Result Revision - What's the Future for Candidates Allotted Seats in Round 1 and 2
    • Law Exams
    • CLAT Exam
    • CLAT 2026 Result Revision - What's the Future for Candidates Allotted Seats in Round 1 and 2

    CLAT 2026 Result Revision - What's the Future for Candidates Allotted Seats in Round 1 and 2

    JasmineUpdated on 06 Feb 2026, 09:33 AM IST

    The Consortium of National Law Universities (NLUs) has postponed the CLAT 2026 third merit list. The decision came after the Allahabad High Court’s verdict on a legal dispute between Avneesh Gupta (Minor) vs Consortium of National Law Universities over the CLAT 2026 final answer key. The petitioner argued that three objections against the CLAT 2026 answer key were not considered even though the expert committee of the Consortium had termed the objections as valid. It was the overview committee that rejected the objections without stating any clear reasons. As a result, Allahabad HC directed the Consortium to revise the CLAT 2026 merit list on February 3, 2026.

    CLAT 2026 Result Revision - What's the Future for Candidates Allotted Seats in Round 1 and 2
    CLAT 2026 Result Revision - What's the Future for Candidates Allotted Seats in Round 1 and 2

    This decision is not likely to impact the shortlisted candidates in CLAT 2026 round 1 and 2 counselling. Allahabad High Court’s detailed judgment also stated that no admissions previously made before the decision should have an impact. The Executive Committee of the consortium has also made an appeal to the Hon’ble Division Bench of the Allahabad HC in its defence.

    Avneesh Gupta vs Consortium of NLUs Overview

    Category

    Details from Judgment

    Case Title

    Avneesh Gupta (Minor) vs. Consortium of National Law Universities

    Court

    High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

    Judgment Delivered On

    February 3, 2026

    Writ Petition No.

    WRIT-C No. 45517 of 2025

    Judicial Officer

    Hon’ble Vivek Saran, J.

    Petitioner

    Avneesh Gupta (Minor)

    Respondent

    Consortium of National Law Universities

    Petitioner’s Counsel

    In Person

    Respondent’s Counsel

    Avneesh Tripathi

    Allahabad HC’s Outcome on CLAT 2026 Result Revision

    Avneesh Gupta, the petitioner, raised an objection against question no 9 of Booklet C in the CLAT 2026 exam. He stated that both options B and D should be the correct answers. The consortium’s expert committee also agreed that this objection was correct. However, the objection was ultimately rejected by the overview committee without giving any clear reasons.

    Allahabad HC eventually directed the consortium to accept the objections raised by Avneesh Gupta and make the required revisions in the CLAT 2026 results. They also instructed that the subsequent rounds of CLAT 2026 counselling should be based on the revised CLAT 2026 results. The consortium must release the revised CLAT 2026 results and the notification on the further CLAT 2026 counselling rounds within one month.

    CLAT 2026 Revised Final Answer Key After HC Order - Marks Gained and Lost

    Candidate’s Response to Q.9 (Booklet-C)

    Marks Before Judgment

    Marks After Judgment

    Net Change

    Selected Option D

    +1

    +1

    No change

    Selected Option B

    −0.25 (treated as wrong earlier)

    +1

    +1.25 marks

    Selected Any Other Option

    −0.25

    −0.25

    No change

    Did Not Attempt

    0

    0

    No change

    CLAT 2026 Result Revision Impact on Candidates Already Admitted

    The CLAT 2026 results revision is unlikely to affect shortlisted candidates of CLAT 2026 Rounds 1 and 2 of the counselling process. The Allahabad HC has ordered that the consortium must revise the results of the remaining candidates. Those who have already been allotted seats in the CLAT 2026 counselling are final. However, they have explicitly mentioned that the revised scores will not impact the candidates who have been allotted in CLAT 2026 round 1 counselling.

    CLAT 2026 Revised Result Impact on Round 1 Admitted Candidates: The Consortium of NLUs, in its notification, has clearly mentioned that candidates who have been allotted seats in the first round won’t face any impact of the Allahabad High Court’s order. The Allahabad High Court’s verdict also mentions, “Since it has been informed at the Bar that the first round of counselling has already been finalized thus the students/candidates who have already taken admission pursuant to the first round of counselling shall not be disturbed, however for further counselling, the respondent are directed to act on the revised/re-notified merit list and the issue (ii) is accordingly decided.”

    CLAT 2026 Revised Result Impact on Round 2 Admitted Candidates: Not much clarity has been given about the impact of the revised merit list of CLAT on candidates who got admission in the second round of counselling in the Allahabad HC’s order. However, the Consortium of NLUs mentioned, “The Consortium intends to take all legal steps to ensure that no seats allotted to students in rounds 1 and 2 of the counselling, which are already concluded, are impacted in any way. The Consortium also intends to reiterate its defence of the Final Answer Key, as previously notified, in its appeal, to ensure that the said key is maintained without any change for future rounds of counselling also.”

    CLAT 2026 To Challenge Allahabad HC’s Decision

    In its defence, the consortium has taken legal actions to safeguard the allotted candidates in both round 1 and round 2 counselling. The consortium’s Executive Committee has filed a Special Appeal before the Division bench of the Allahabad HC. They are also planning to defend the CLAT 2026 final answer key to ensure no further changes are made. The aim is to protect the candidates who are yet to be allotted seats in the upcoming counselling rounds. Any legal updates regarding the status of CLAT 2026 admissions in the first and second rounds of counselling shall be updated in the article.

    Articles
    |
    Upcoming Law Exams
    Ongoing Dates
    AIL LET Application Date

    22 Apr'26 - 5 Jun'26 (Online)

    Certifications By Top Providers
    Indian Government and Politics
    Via University of Kashmir, Srinagar
    Literary Criticism From Plato to Leavis
    Via Indian Institute of Technology Madras
    Applied Econometrics
    Via Indian Institute of Technology Madras
    Study from Still Life
    Via Indira Gandhi National Open University, New Delhi
    Geography of India
    Via University of Mysore, Mysore
    Swayam
     168 courses
    Edx
     129 courses
    NPTEL
     80 courses
    Futurelearn
     74 courses
    Explore Top Universities Across Globe

    Questions related to CLAT

    On Question asked by student community

    Have a question related to CLAT ?

    Hi,

    If you're sure that you want to pursue law, then CLAT is generally the better option. It is the gateway to most National Law Universities (NLUs), which are among the top law colleges in India.

    However, CUET is also worth considering as it can help you get admission to

    Hello Dear Student,


    With a CLAT PG rank of 4649 and CUET PG score of 106 , getting top NLUs or central universities may be difficult. However, you still have good options for pursuing an LLM in Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) at private and state-affiliated universities.

    Some suitable options include:

    Hello Dear Student,

    You should prepare for CLAT if your goal is to get admission into a top National Law University (NLU) for a 5-year integrated law course like BA LLB or BBA LLB.

    You should choose CUET UG if you want admission into:

    • central universities,
    • state universities, or
    • some

    Hi,
    Yes, you should appear for the compartment/improvement exam in the subject where you got RT (Reappear in Theory).

    Even though your 72% overall marks are enough for Common Law Admission Test 2027 eligibility, clearing the RT is still very important because your Class 12 marksheet should officially show “PASS.”