UPES Integrated LLB Admissions 2026
Ranked #18 amongst Institutions in India by NIRF | Ranked #1 in India for Academic Reputation by QS Rankings | 16 LPA Highest CTC
The Consortium of National Law Universities (CNLU) has set up a five-member committee to review the CLAT questions and test structure, and to compare them with the LNAT and LSAT exams. The reforms suggested by the committee will be implemented from CLAT 2027 onwards. This means there are good chances of a syllabus overhaul and CLAT might adopt globally accepted benchmarks.
Candidates can submit objections to the CLAT 2026 provisional answer key till 5 pm on December 12. Each objection requires a fee of Rs 500, which will be refunded if the objection is found valid. Subject experts will review all submitted objections and make necessary corrections before releasing the final answer key.
The 2026 CLAT has five sections in the question paper. These are based on subjects - English comprehension, logical reasoning, legal reasoning, Maths, current affairs and general knowledge. The CLAT syllabus emphasises both critical thinking and rote memorisation. However, the question paper is in a comprehensive-heavy format, making it lengthy and extremely difficult for students who struggle in English.
Subject Areas with weightage: | (approximate number of questions) |
English Language | 22-26 questions, or roughly 20% of the paper |
Current Affairs, including General Knowledge | 28-32 questions, or roughly 25% of the paper |
Legal Reasoning | 28-32 questions, or roughly 25% of the paper |
Logical Reasoning | 22-26 questions, or roughly 20% of the paper |
Quantitative Techniques | 10-14 questions, or roughly 10% of the paper |
The committee reviewing the CLAT with four terms of reference. These are:
Question quality
Structure of the paper
Syllabus of the exam
A comparative review of the LNAT and LSAT exams
The review of the CLAT in line with the four terms given above can not only change the syllabus but also the pattern and structure of the test.
With regard to question quality, the consortium faced criticism in recent years for asking ambiguous questions with incorrect answers. A majority of the questions in CLAT are asked from comprehension passages, requiring interpretation and critical analysis of the content before one answers the underlying questions. The interpretation element in CLAT has been contested in past, resulting in students knocking on the doors of various high courts and the Supreme Court. Last year, the consortium was forced to revise the CLAT results following the Supreme Court order.
A review of question quality should aim to minimise misinterpretation and ambiguity in questions. This would require careful framing of inference-based questions where answers are clearly identifiable.
The structure of the CLAT question paper is comprehension-heavy, often overwhelming students. Each section contains multiple passages of 400-450 words.
The general knowledge and current affairs sections are uniquely designed to test reading skills before awareness of national and international affairs. A reformed CLAT, if it prioritises skills over rote memorisation, should move away from factual general knowledge.
A comparative review of LSAT and LNAT with CLAT and subsequent revisions should bring the exam into parity with globally accepted benchmarks. The LSAT and LNAT very comprehensively target skill testing. Prior knowledge of law or general awareness is not considered crucial in these exams. Instead, focus is given to reading comprehension, critical thinking, analytical skills and essay writing.
Quantitative skills are also not included in the LSAT and LNAT patterns, nor are they included in the All India Law Entrance Test (AILET) conducted by the National Law University, Delhi.
The logical reasoning and legal reasoning sections also need a review. These two sections in the current CLAT pattern become indistinguishable. The logical reasoning section, with comprehension paragraphs on current issues and analytical news articles, brings it very close to legal reasoning in terms of testing critical thinking. So, either these two subjects should be merged with each other, making one logical reasoning section, or there should be a clear demarcation between these two sections. One tests critical thinking through legal-journalistic material, another is more inclusive of logical-analytical reasoning involving slightly objective questions such as identification of patterns, puzzles, relations or seating arrangements.
Keeping in mind the terms of reference, the reformed CLAT should:
Have a more objective test of critical thinking and analytical skills.
Reading comprehension can remain at the core for being indispensable in three sections — English, logical reasoning and legal reasoning.
The maths sections can be removed by shifting some elements of basic data interpretation into logical reasoning
General knowledge should have no place in the reformed test structure if it is truly aligned with the global benchmarks.
Logical reasoning and legal reasoning are indistinguishable — they should either be merged or kept separate with objective clarity.
A revised CLAT syllabus is likely to have three sections.
English comprehension
Logical reasoning inclusive of legal aptitude
Current affairs
Above all, the priority should be conducting a glitch-free CLAT with fewer errors in answer keys and results. CLAT, since its inception, has frequently encountered glitches, answer key errors, and transparency issues. The objection fees of Rs 1000 are a compounding problem for students that needs a review. While many of these are issues related to the administration of the test, the answer key issues can be addressed with better framing of questions.
Meanwhile, students preparing for CLAT 2027 should consider these reforms in their preparation strategy. Focus on reading comprehension and logical reasoning based on news and journalist material to begin with. It is likely to remain key in the new CLAT syllabus.
Disclaimer: These are expected changes and suggestion for a CLAT reforms. The report of Committee of Independent Academic Experts is yet to be published. Any changes in CLAT 2027 will be notified by Consortium of NLUs on its official website.
On Question asked by student community
If you are expecting around 80 marks in CLAT 2026, your chances will mainly depend on that year’s overall difficulty level and how the marks translate into ranks. In most years, a score around 80 usually places candidates somewhere in the mid-rank range, which means that the top NLUs like NLSIU Bengaluru, NALSAR Hyderabad or WBNUJS Kolkata are generally difficult to get at this score. However, some of the newer or mid-tier NLUs may still be possible depending on cut-offs, reservation category, and seat availability during later rounds. Students with similar scores in past years have sometimes received calls from NLUs such as NLU Jabalpur, NLU Assam, NLU Tripura, NLU Aurangabad, or NLU Shimla, but the exact possibilities shift every year. Treat this score as competitive but not in the top bracket, and wait for the official ranks to get a clearer picture of which options are realistically open. All the best!
Hello aspirant,
With 64.5 marks in CLAT 2026 and EWS+UP domicile, getting a top NLU may be difficult because EWS cutoffs are usually high. However, you may still have chances in the newer or mid-tier NLUs, depending on this year's overall scoring trend. NLUs like NLU Tripura, NLU Shimla or NLU Jabalpur sometimes open seats for EWS candidates at lower scores. It's best to wait for the official ranks and counselling lists, as seats shift during later rounds.
FOR REFERENCE : https://law.careers360.com/articles/clat-cutoff
THANK YOU
Hello aspirant,
Getting 43 in CLAT can feel disappointing, but it doesn't define your ability. You still have AILET, and many students improve sharply in their second attempt. For AILET, focus more on English, logical reasoning and GK. In static GK, study important books, monuments, national parks, constitutional facts and major awards. For current affairs, revise the last 6-8 months covering national events, government schemes, appointments, sports and major international news. Make short notes and revise daily. With a clear plan and claim mind, you can perform much better in AILET.
FOR GUIDANCE : https://law.careers360.com/articles/ailet-preparation-tips
THANK YOU
Hello,
Here are the Expected SC Category Cut-offs (CLAT UG 2026):
For more details access below mentioned link.
https://law.careers360.com/articles/clat-cut-off-2026-for-sc-category
Hope it helps.
Good Morning, Candidate,
It entirely depends on the university whether the admission for the BA LLB will be based on the 12th board or the national-level entrance exam, or both. The admission exams are below
1. Common Law Admission Test
2. All India Law Entrance Test
3. Symbiosis Law Admission Test
4. Common University Entrance Test
Thank you. Hope this information helps you.
Among top 100 Universities Globally in the Times Higher Education (THE) Interdisciplinary Science Rankings 2026
Integrated Learning – A balanced blend of management and legal education
Ranked #18 amongst Institutions in India by NIRF | Ranked #1 in India for Academic Reputation by QS Rankings | 16 LPA Highest CTC
Approved by BCI | Continuous interaction with leading experts from the industry | Global Exposure
Admissions open for B.A. LL.B. (Hons.), B.B.A. LL.B. (Hons.) and LL.B Program (3 Years) | School of Law, MRU ranked No. 1 in Law Schools of Excellence in India by GHRDC (2023)
Last Date to Apply: 21st December 2025 | Grade 'A+' accredited by NAAC | Ranked 33rd by NIRF 2025