CLAT PG 2024 Question Paper with Solutions - Download Answer Key PDF
Are you preparing for CLAT PG 2026? Look at the CLAT PG Question Paper Analysis 2024 to better prepare for CLAT PG 2026! CLAT PG is an examination that happens every year in December as a gateway to entering master's programs of Law at national law universities. It serves 2 purposes. Firstly, it is a gateway to enter into prestigious national universities of India for the Masters program and secondly, the Top ranker gets a direct election in public sector undertakings as a law officer. Many people go for the second idea as it is completely dependent upon the law subjects that one has read on the journey of Law School.
This Story also Contains
- CLAT PG 2024 Question Paper with Answer Key & Detailed Solutions PDF
- CLAT PG 2024 Question Papers: Subject-wise division
- CLAT PG 2024 Question Paper and Answer
CLAT PG 2024 Question Paper with Answer Key & Detailed Solutions PDF
| CLAT PG Question Paper 2024 | Download PDF |
You may also check the previous year's question paper with detailed solutions:
CLAT PG 2024 Question Papers: Subject-wise division
The bulk of passages on the CLAT PG 2024 Exam focused on Important Topics of CLAT PG such as the Constitution, Criminal Law, Contract Law, Transfer of Property Act, and Jurisprudence. Here is a breakdown of the constitutional law passages covered in the Exam.
Constitutional and criminal law: There were a total of three passages each from constitutional and criminal law. The subject saw the levels of difficulty on various levels. Constitutional law was on the easier to moderate side whereas criminal law was a bit challenging as it came up with the case, laws and direct questions.
Jurisprudence: There were a total of two passages on jurisprudence. It was quite an easier side. The questions were direct. The indirect questions referred to cases were absent making the passage relatively easy as compared to constitutional and criminal law.
Tort law: As it is seen in the various years of the Law School journey tort law is not much developed in India, still, the topic came in the examination with torture liability of the state, which was not anticipated by any of the students as per the trends.
Historical and legal current affairs: As the paper part and changed, the relevance also changed this year. The paper included five passages related to 2023 three passages related to 2022 and landmark judgements of various years one of the passages was on genocide which is focused on public interest litigation, as it was mentioned that it will be a passage-based examination. Such questions could have been expected.
Miscellaneous topics: Miscellaneous topics include subjects which are less focused and do not have much weightage, but this year passages from lesser focus. Subjects also came by topics were specific relief, act and taxation, which are kind of procedural appeared in the examination.
CLAT PG 2026 Unofficial Answer Key with Solutions
Access the CLAT PG 2026 unofficial answer key with detailed solutions to evaluate your performance, estimate your score, and understand the correct approach for each question.
Download EBookAs the paper pattern has changed and given the length of the paper time, management and selective answering are crucial skills, a strong foundation in major loss subjects such as constitutional law, criminal law, jurisprudence, administrative law, public international law is important as per must be prepared for unexpected topics and must and must read the current legal affairs as well as the updated with the landmark judgement. A comprehensive reading skill would be appreciated.
CLAT PG 2024 Question Paper and Answer
An unpleasant tussle occurred between TATA Sons and Cyrus Pallonji Mistry (“CPM”) in October 2016, when Mistry, who was the sixth chairman of Tata Sons, was ousted from the position of Executive Chairman of Tata Sons Limited. CPM took over as the chairman in 2012 after Ratan Tata announced his retirement. Tata Group patriarch Ratan Tata had personally asked Cyrus Mistry to resign as chairman of Tata Sons as the board had lost faith in him, but his refusal led to the removal via majority vote. Cyrus Investments Private Limited and Sterling Investment Corporation Private Limited belonged to the Shapoorji Palloni Group in which CPM held a controlling interest (about 2% of the issued share capital of Tata Sons). Seven out of the nine directors of Tata Sons voted for CPM’s replacement after Farida Khambata abstained and Mistry was declared ineligible to vote as he was an interested director. Mistry challenged his removal, accusing the board of mismanagement and of oppressing minority shareholders. however, the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) rejected his petition. After this Mistry challenged his removal in National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). In 2018, the NCLAT order restored Mistry as the group’s executive chairman. Tata Sons challenged that NCLAT order in the Supreme Court. CPM also challenged the order for a few more relief. Supreme Court stayed NCLAT’s order reinstating Cyrus Mistry as the executive chairman of Tata Sons and restoring his directorships in the holding company as well as three group companies, with a preliminary observation that the first impression of the order was “not good” and that the tribunal ‘could’ not have given consequential relief that had not been sought in the first place. Ultimately, the Supreme Court decided the case in favour of Tata Sons. One of the issues decided by Supreme Court was that “whether the case was fit to be qualified as a situation of ‘Oppression and Mismanagement’ under Section 241 of the Companies Act, 2013?”. On this issue, the Supreme Court observed that “unless the removal of a person as a chairman of a company is oppressive or mismanaged or done in a prejudicial manner damaging the interests of the company, its members or the public at large, the NCLT cannot interfere with the removal of a person as a Chairman of a Company in a petition under Section 241 of the Companies Act, 2013.” This case highlighted the point that “an executive chairman does not have sovereign authority over the company. In corporate democracy, decision making always remains with the Board as long as they enjoy the pleasure of the shareholders. Likewise, an executive chairman will continue as long as he/she enjoys the pleasure of the Board. An assumption by the executive chairman that he/she would have a free hand in running the affairs of the company is incongruous to corporate governance and corporate democracy. The Tribunal held that the concept of ‘free hand rule’ is antithesis to collective responsibility and collective decision making”. [Based on Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. v. Cyrus Investment Pvt. Ltd., 2021 SCC 122].
Q1. The parties in this case approached the Supreme Court of India under which of the following provision:
(A) Appeal under section 423 of the Companies Act, 2013.
(B) A Class Action Suit under Section 245 of the Companies Act, 2013.
(C) Special Leave Petition (SLP) under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.
(D) Appeal under section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Answer - (C) Special Leave Petition (SLP) under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.
Explanation: This is correct as SLP under Article 136 is the Supreme Court's
discretionary power to hear appeals against any court or tribunal's decision in
India.
Q2. The rule of ‘supremacy of majority’ in governing the affairs of a company has been settled in a very old leading case of Foss v. Harbottle (1843) 2 Hare 461. In India, which case diluted the majority rule and held that the interest of the company was above the interest of its shareholders either majority or minority?
(A) Rajahmundry Electric Supply Corporation Ltd. v. A. Nageshwara Rao
(B) Bagree Cereals v. Hanuman Prasad Bagri.
(C) Shanti Prasad Jain v. Kalinga Tubes Ltd.
(D) Needle Industries (India) Ltd. v. Needle Industries Newey (India).
Answer - (D) Needle Industries (India) Ltd. v. Needle Industries Newey (India) Holding Ltd.
Explanation: This is correct because it emphasises that the company's interests prevail over the majority's interests, establishing a precedent for protecting minority shareholders and the company itself.
Q3. While recommending “Separation of the Roles of Non-executive Chairperson and Managing Director/ CEO”, the Kotak Mahindra Committee quoted the following text: “Given the importance and the particular nature of the chairmen’s role, it should in principle be separate from that of the chief executive. If the two roles are combined in one person, it represents a considerable concentration of power”. This quote refers to which of the following Committee Report?
(A) Cohen Committee Report
(B) Cadbury Committee Report
(C) Hampel Committee Report
(D) Narayana Murthy Committee Report
Answer - (B) Cadbury Committee Report
Explanation: Correct because the Cadbury Committee Report is known for its recommendations on corporate governance, including the separation of the roles of the chairperson and CEO/MD.
Q4. Which of the following statement is true regarding share qualification requirement under section 244 for applying for relief from oppression/ mismanagement under section 241 of the Companies Act, 2013 (in the case of a company having a share capital)?
(A) Members not less than 100 members of the company or 10% of the total number of its members, whichever is less or any member or members holding not less than 10% of the issued share capital of the company.
(B) Members not less than 100 members of the company and 10% of the total number of its members or members holding not less than 10% of the issued share capital of the company.
(C) Not less than 20% of the total number of its members.
(D) Members not less than 50 members of the company and 5% of the total number of its members or members holding not less than 5% of the issued share capital of the company.
Answer - (A) Members not less than 100 members of the company or 10% of the total number of its members, whichever is less or any member or members holding not less than 10% of the issued share capital of the company.
Explanation: This is the accurate requirement under section 244 for members to apply for relief under section 241, providing two pathways based on the number of members or the percentage of issued share capital they hold.
Q5. Statement I - Power to grant relief from oppression/mismanagement which were vested by section 402 of the 1956 Act in High Court have now been transferred to the National Company Law Tribunal by section 242 of the 2013 Act. Statement II - Section 242 does not empower National Company Law Appellate Tribunal to grant relief by way of prevention of apprehended mismanagement of the company due to material change which has taken place in its management or control.
(A) Statement I is untrue
(B) Statement II is untrue
(C) Both Statements I and II are untrue
(D) Both Statements I and II are true
Answer - (D) Both Statements I and II are true. Explanation for Statement I: True, as the Companies Act of 2013 shifted the jurisdiction for these matters from the High Courts to the NCLT, reflecting a significant change in handling cases of oppression and mismanagement.
Explanation for Statement II: Also true, as Section 242 focuses on addressing actual instances of oppression or mismanagement rather than preemptive action based on potential future mismanagement
You may also check:
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q: How was the CLAT PG 2024 paper?
A:
Additionally, general knowledge was mediocre with a few unexpected subjects. Legal was moderately long, but not very long. It was moderately long overall.
Q: Is CLAT PG easy to crack?
A:
Taking the CLAT PG 2026 test is necessary to get into a top NLU for your LLM, and depending on your preparation level, it might be fairly difficult. The previous year's question paper's degree of difficulty underlines how crucial careful planning is.
Q: Is 50 a good score in CLAT PG?
A:
In CLAT 2024, 50 out of 120 is regarded as below ordinary.
Q: Are questions repeated in CLAT PG?
A:
Yes, the questions on logical reasoning, quantitative aptitude, and legal reasoning are frequently repeated by the Consortium of NLU. I mean that by asking the same question again, the same reasoning is used for the solution. The only variables that are altered are the numbers.
Q: What is the difficulty level of CLAT PG 2024?
A:
In terms of difficulty, the CLAT 2024 was largely regarded as easy to moderate. When compared to the previous year's test, most students who took it thought it was comparatively simpler.
Articles
Related Stories
|
Upcoming Law Exams
Certifications By Top Providers
Explore Top Universities Across Globe
Popular Courses and Specializations
Popular Degrees
List of colleges accepting CLAT PG
Browse Law Colleges by State
Questions related to CLAT PG
On Question asked by student community
Have a question related to CLAT PG ?
With a CLAT PG rank of 1257 in the SC category and being a woman candidate with Rajasthan domicile, you do have a realistic chance of securing admission to several National Law Universities, though the top NLUs may be difficult at this rank. Admission chances depend heavily on category-wise cut-offs, domicile reservations, and how many seats are available in a given year. For top-tier NLUs like NLSIU Bengaluru, NALSAR Hyderabad, or NLUD, the closing ranks for SC category usually fall much lower, so chances there are minimal. However, you should definitely consider mid- and lower-ranked NLUs where SC category cut-offs often extend beyond 1200–1500 ranks.
You should prioritise NLUs that offer domicile or state quota benefits, especially those closer to your home state or neighbouring regions. National Law University Jodhpur (if applicable under domicile or category movement), Hidayatullah National Law University Raipur, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University Lucknow, Gujarat National Law University Gandhinagar, Maharashtra National Law University (Nagpur or Aurangabad), National Law University Odisha, and Tamil Nadu National Law University are some options where candidates in the SC category with similar ranks have secured seats in previous counselling rounds. Lower-tier NLUs like Damodaram Sanjivayya National Law University, Himachal Pradesh National Law University, and Dharmashastra National Law University can also be kept in your preference list as safer options.
Your strategy should be to keep a wide preference list during counselling, placing mid-ranked NLUs first and then moving to lower NLUs, rather than restricting yourself only to a few choices. Also, stay active during subsequent counselling rounds and vacancy rounds, as many seats in the SC category are filled later due to withdrawals. Overall, while top NLUs may be tough, you have a fair chance of getting into a decent NLU if you plan your preferences smartly and remain flexible.
With a CLAT PG rank of around 11,000, getting admission into the top National Law Universities (NLUs) is not likely, as their general category cut-offs usually close much earlier. However, you still have realistic chances in lower-ranked and newer NLUs, especially in the later rounds of CLAT counselling or through vacant seats.
At this rank, you may consider NLUs such as NLU Tripura, NLU Meghalaya, NLU Nagaland, NLU Sikkim, NLU Andhra Pradesh, NLU Odisha, NLU Jabalpur, and NLU Aurangabad, particularly if you belong to a reserved category like SC, ST, OBC, EWS, or have domicile or women reservation applicable. Cut-offs for these universities tend to go higher in rank compared to older NLUs, and seats often open up in subsequent counselling rounds due to withdrawals.
If you do not secure an NLU seat, you should also strongly consider reputed state and private law universities that accept CLAT PG scores or conduct their own entrance tests. Universities such as Faculty of Law, Banaras Hindu University (BHU), Delhi University (DU – through CUET PG), Jamia Millia Islamia, Symbiosis Law School, Christ University, Jindal Global Law School, and Nirma University are good alternatives for LLM aspirants. Many of these institutions offer strong academic exposure, experienced faculty, and good research opportunities, sometimes even better than newer NLUs.
Overall, while a rank of 11,000 limits options in top NLUs, admission is still possible in newer NLUs or good non-NLU law universities, provided you actively participate in counselling rounds and keep backup options ready.
Hello,
Here is your CLAT 2026 Rank-Wise College List - Available NLUs in your rank range. I am providing you the link. Kindly open and check it out.
https://law.careers360.com/articles/clat-2026-rank-wise-college-list
I hope it will help you. For any further query please let me know.
Thank you.
The clat pg 2025 first allotment list for tamil nadu national law university (tnnlu), tiruchirappalli, was officially released on may 26, 2025. according to the first round seat allotment results for the pg (llm) program, the all india closing rank for the general category at nlu trichy was 1,290. for candidates under the home state quota, the closing ranks were significantly higher, with the general category closing at 2,696 and other categories like bcm-tn and sc-tn closing at 3,183 and 5,799 respectively. students who have been allotted a seat in this round must complete their confirmation fee payment and choose between the freeze, float, or exit options within the stipulated deadline to secure their admission. for the upcoming 2026 session, the first allotment list is expected to be published on january 7, 2026, following the counselling registration period in december 2025. you can check the detailed category-wise opening and closing ranks and download the official allotment pdf by visiting the following link: https://www.careers360.com/university/tamil-nadu-national-law-university-tiruchirappalli/cut-off
Hello aspirant ,
Nirma University admits students to its UG law courses like BA LLB or BCom LLB based on CLAT scores. While exact marks vary by year and category , a CLAT score around 140-150 is often considered safe for admission there , though it can change with seat demand and counselling for the most accurate picture.
FOR REFERENCE : https://law.careers360.com/articles/clat-cutoff
Hope the details will help you.
THANK YOU
Apply for admission in Masters in Law for
Among top 100 Universities Globally in the Times Higher Education (THE) Interdisciplinary Science Rankings 2026
Chandigarh University Admissions 2026
ApplyNAAC A+ Accredited | Among top 2% Universities Globally (QS World University Rankings 2026)
TopRankers Judiciary Exam Prep
ApplyRegister for Judiciary Exam Preparation from TopRankers.
Manipal Online M.Com Admissions
ApplyApply for Online M.Com from Manipal University
CLAT Legal Reasoning Mock Tests
ApplyFree Ebook - CLAT 2025 legal reasoning questions with detailed solutions
CLAT PG Notifications
Never miss CLAT PG update
Get timely CLAT PG updates directly to your inbox. Stay informed!