MH CET 5-year LLB 2026 Expected Question Paper

MH CET 5-year LLB 2026 Expected Question Paper

One of the smartest ways to prepare for MH CET Law is by solving questions that have frequently appeared in MH CET 5-year LLB 2026 Previous Year Question. These questions provide insight into important topics and help candidates focus on high-scoring areas.

Q1. Directions: In the following question, a sentence is given with a blank that is to be filled in with an appropriate word. Four alternatives are suggested; choose the correct alternative out of them as your answer.

He has no recommendations; he will .........get the job.

A) However

B) whatsoever

C) whereas

D) whatever

B) whatsoever
Explanation: "Whatsoever" emphasises the lack of recommendations and aligns with the context of the sentence.

Q2.Directions: In the following question, a sentence is given with a blank that is to be filled in with an appropriate word. Four alternatives are suggested; choose the correct alternative out of them as your answer.

Leaves .......... in autumn.

A) fall down

B) fall of

C) fall on

D) fall off

A) fall down
Explanation: Leaves naturally "fall down" in autumn; this is the correct verb to describe the action.

Q3. What are the upper chambers of the heart called in animals with a circulatory system?

1. Atria

2. Ventricles

3. Arteries

4. Capillaries

Explanation: The upper chambers of the heart in animals with a circulatory system are called "atria."

Q4.A and B together can do a piece of work in 24 days and A alone can complete the work in 36 days. How long will B alone take to complete the work?

A] 72 days.

B] 62 days.

C] 52 days.

D] 42 days.

A: Work done by A alone in 1 day = 1/36

Explanation: Work done by both in 1 day = 1/ 24

Hence work done by B alone in 1 day = 1/24- 1/36 = 1/72

And hence B will complete the work in 72 days.

Q5.Direction: In the following question, select the number that can be placed at the sign of the question mark (?) from the given alternatives.

A) 35

B) 42

C) 45

D) 95

Explanation: Given: The pattern can be observed running horizontally along the rows.
Row 1: (3 × 10) + 1 = 31 → 31 × 6 = 186
Row 2: (9 × 5) + 1 = 46 → 46 × 3 = 138
Row 3: (5 × 7) + 1 = 36 → 36 × 1 = 36
Row 4: (3 × 2) + 1 = 7 → 7 × 5 = 35

So, 35 is the missing number. Hence, the first option is correct.

Q6.PRINCIPLE: Contractual liability is completely irrelevant to the existence of liability in torts.

FACTS: X purchased a bottle of ginger-beer from a retailer. As she consumed more than ¾ of the contents of the bottle, she found decomposed remains of a snail in the bottle. After seeing the remains of a snail, she fell sick on the thought of what she consumed. She sued the manufacturer of the beer for negligence, though there is no contractual duty on the part of the manufacturer.Decision:

(a) X cannot sue the manufacturer for negligence in the absence of a contract.

(b) X can sue the retailer from whom she purchased the beer.

(c) X cannot sue the retailer

(d) X can sue the manufacturer as he had a duty to take care to see that bottles did not contain any other substance than the best.

Explanation: D, X can sue the manufacturer as he had a duty to take care to see that bottles did not contain any other substance than the best. Donhogue vs Stevenson is the case to refer thus option d is correct.

Q7. PRINCIPLE: A man is liable to compensate his neighbour if he uses of his property unreasonably and unnecessarily to cause inconvenience to his neighbours.

FACTS: Mr. Z is the owner of a plot measuring 50 feet by 80 feet. He constructed a small house at one corner and was using the rest of the land as a cow shed. He had 20 cows and is involved in selling the milk to the public. The cow dung and other wastes were openly stored in a small 10 feet by 8 feet tank. This constantly paved way for bad smell and breeding of mosquitoes. Mrs. Y, his neighbour constantly complained to Mr. Z but in vain.Decision:

(a) Y cannot take any other action against Z.

(b) Z can do something to prevent the foul smell.

(c) Y can complain to the police.

(d) Y can sue Z for damages based on the inconvenience caused by Z.

Explanation: D, Y can sue Z for damages based on the inconvenience caused by Z it will lead to indirect trespass . thus option d is correct.

Q8.PRINCIPLE: In a divorce petition filed by either the husband or the wife, a decree of divorce may be granted if the other party has treated the petitioner with cruelty.

FACTUAL SITUATION: Amit and Sonal are husband and wife. While they were coming from a trip from Goa, on the Railway Station at Margaon their 4 year old son met with an accident due to negligence of Sonal. The Husband got furious and slapped his wife and due this incident she filed divorce petition.DECIDE: Whether divorce petition can be filed or not?

(a) Divorce petition cannot be filed because Sonal was in fault.

(b) Divorce petition can be filed because Amit slapped Sonal and it is cruelty against woman

(c) Divorce petition cannot be filed because husband has right to slap his wife

(d) Divorce petition cannot be filed because slapping to his wife is not cruelty.

Explanation: B, A divorce petition can be filed because Amit slapped Sonal, and it is cruelty against a woman. As the negligence was completely without mens rea thus cruelty; hence option b is correct.

Q9.PRINCIPLE: Under section 3 of the Limitation Act limitation bars the remedy, but not the right

FACTUAL SITUATION: Rajesh took a loan from Manish after the expiry of the period of limitation of three years. Rajesh made a part payment of debt to creditor Manish. Manish then files a suit against Rajesh for recovery of the debt after two years from the date of part payment.DECIDE: Manish can file a suit or not.

(a) The part payment made by Rajesh extends the period of limitation.

(b) The suit is time barred under the Limitation Act. So, it cannot be filed

(c) A fresh period of limitation begins from the date of part payment

(d) Manish can file a suit under the exception of Limitation Act, section 3

Explanation: C, Fresh period of limitation begins from the date of part payment.

Q10.PRINCIPLE: A time - barred debt cannot be enforced in a Court of law, without a valid reason for the delay. The time limit for enforcing a debt is 3 years from the date of the demand made for repayment.

FACTS: Mr Govind had lent Rs. 10 lakh to Ms Nilanjana. Ms Nilanjana had executed a Promissory Note, promising to repay the loan amount along with interest whenever it is demanded by Mr Govind. The loan was given on 1-1-2000. Mr Govind demanded the lent amount of Rs 10 lakhs along with the agreed amount of interest on 1-2-2003. In the meantime, Mr Govind, a busy exporter, who was also diagnosed with cancer, forgot about the recovery of the amount. On 30th April, 2006, Mr Govind remembers the loan due from Ms Nilanjana and accordingly demands the repayment of the loan. Ms Nilanjana is not serious about the repayment now.

(a) Mr Govind can take the money only if Ms Nilanjana gives the amount out of her own Will.

(b) Mr Govind can go to the Court and file a suit explaining the reasons for the delay. The court will accept the same.

(c) This is a bad law, and the constitutionality has to be questioned in the High Court.

(d) Mr Govind can use other services and methods to recover the amount, as it is his hard-earned money.

Explanation: B, Mr Govind can go to the Court and file a suit explaining the reasons for the delay. The court will accept the same. It is called as the condonation of delay. Hence, option B is correct.